日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

海洋文化・文明に関する調査報告書(英文)

 事業名 基盤整備
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


Shibusawa said, _You cannot run a business unless you have the necessary capital. I therefore purchased stocks and public bonds and received a salary. But my aim was not to increase my assets. I buy 100,000 yen s worth of stock and if business is good its value might increase to 200,000 or even 300,000 yen. Yet my aim is not this increase in wealth but to ensure that the business gets into this kind of situation. That is all. I haven_t thought about my personal profit even for a moment._ These words of Shibusawa_s show that he should be viewed as a manager and entrepreneur rather than as a capitalist.

The same can be said of Godai Tomoatsu. Born the son of a samurai in the Satsuma domain (now Kagoshima Prefecture), Godai took a post in the Meiji government but resigned from government office in 1869 and devoted the rest of his life to the promotion of commercial private enterprises. At the time of the Meiji Restoration, samurai in Japan gave up their special privileges. This voluntary abandonment of privileges would have been unthinkable in Western society, where people of all social standings have always insisted on their rights as a matter of course. The reason why this was possible in Japan was that the samurai did not own land.

Unlike their Western counterparts, Japan_s rulers, the samurai, did not own land. They lived on retainers_ stipends in castle towns under a system in which the warrior and farming classes were separated. In effect, therefore, the samurai had nothing to lose. What they did have, however, was a managerial disposition and business abilities, as can be seen from the careers of men like Shibusawa and Godai. We can suppose that this managerial disposition was a product of the _weeding out_ over the years of the ability to govern, which was the duty of the samurai in the Edo era. It seems that through the refinement of this ability to govern as they fulfilled their administrative duties, the samurai developed this managerial disposition.

 

The Limitations of the British Model in _Otsuka_s History_

The economic historian Otsuka Hisao (1907_1996) had an enormous influence on the study of history in postwar Japan. Through the impact of studies such as his Introduction to Modern European Economic History and Basic Theory of Communities (published by Iwanami Shoten, 1981, in Japanese), as well as his translation and analysis of Max Weber_s Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus (The Spirit of Capitalism: The Max Weber Thesis in as Economic Histrical Perspective, translated by Masanori Kondo, published by Iwanami Shoten, 1982), his work became known as _Otsuka_s history,_ an accolade accorded to no other Japanese economic historian.

Those with an interest in social sciences have undoubtedly made reference to Otsuka s enlightening studies such as The Place of Man in Social Science (published by Iwanami Shoten, 1977, in Japanese) and Methodology of Social Science (published by Iwanami Shoten, 1979, in Japanese). Like Marx, Otsuka took Britain as his criterion for the analysis of modern society, painstakingly explaining the fundamentals of modernization to _backward Japan._ According to Otsuka_s simple explanation, the ideal type of man in modern society would be like Robinson Crusoe, the hero of the famous story of the same name by the English novelist Daniel Defoe (1660_1731). Otsuka describes Crusoe_s way of living as follows: _He builds his own house, surrounding it with trees. He sets up a workshop next to the house, where he makes clothes, hats and umbrellas from goatskins, as well as pottery and so On. In addition to the area enclosing his house, he makes other enclosures using fences. He makes one of them into a wheat field where he sows the wheat he found in the ship. Leaving part of the harvest as seeds, he uses the rest as food. He also turns another enclosure into pasture for livestock, catches wild goats, breeds them, and uses some of them for meat when necessary. He uses this meat to cook delicious stews in the pot he has made himself and the skin as material to make clothes, hat, umbrellas and the like. He has enclosed the land around him and can declare himself the master of this enclosure._

The key word in this summary, _enclosure,_ was a fundamental aspect of eighteenth-century British society.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,508位
(32,645成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
6,188

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年10月24日

関連する他の成果物

1.「SYLFF WORKING PAPERS NO.15」ビデオ (http://www.princeton.edu/duke)
2.東京財団1999年度年次報告書(和文)
3.東京財団1999年年次報告書(英文)
4.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第1回オープニングセッション?
5.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第2回世界の人々のアイデンティティ作りに役立つマンガ・アニメ?
6.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第3回マンガ・アニメ産業の存立基盤はSOHOにあり?
7.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第4回日本製マンガ・アニメが高い価値で世界市場で流通し日本にとっての収益源となるために、いま何が必要か?
8.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第5回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイスは地方からスタートする?
9.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第6回日本製マンガ・アニメが更に発展するには何が必要か?
10.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第7回文化のローカライゼーション?
11.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第8回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイムは地方からスタートする?
12.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第9回キャラクタービジネスのパースペクティブ?
13.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第11回ポップカルチャーが作る新しい勢力図?
14.世界都市東京フォーラム「技術からの考案」会議録
15.世界都市東京フォーラム「歴史と文化からの考案」会議録
16.「日米韓安全保障協力:平時と有事の想定」
17.「米中両国にとっての朝鮮半島?日本の対朝鮮半島政策への含意」
18.Japan’s New Middle Eastern Policy
19.Policy Analysis Review
20.英文冊子 Intellectual Cabinet 2000
21.「国会におけるODA基本法の論議と地方自治体による援助の重要性」
22.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.18 「日本の外交安全保障戦略を考える」
23.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.19 「NPO法施行後の現状と課題」
24.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.23 「ビジネスモデルを通じた産業のダイナミズム」
25.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.26 「国民参加型外交の可能性と課題」
26.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.27 「これからの朝鮮半島の行方」
27.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.28 「マスコミによる経済事象の選択と報道」
28.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.29 「陳水扁新政権下の台湾政治」
29.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.30 「朝鮮半島の将来に日本が貢献できること」
30.「政策シリーズ」第18号「霞ヶ関1府12省体制は行革の決定通り進んでいるか?」
31.「政策シリーズ」第20号「金融監督政策の方向性について」
32.「政策シリーズ」第21号「COP6に向けた我が国の取り組み」
33.平成11年度里親研修会テキスト
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から