日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

海洋文化・文明に関する調査報告書(英文)

 事業名 基盤整備
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


In the commercial activities of British gentlemen, private land ownership and business administration went hand in hand, while the local administrative activities of the modern samurai were not and, precisely speaking, could not be oriented towards land ownership. The reason for this was that, since the land and resources of each domain were limited, modern samurai had no choice but to recycle resources and eliminate waste rather than struggle for land.

The owner of the means of production including capital and land is a _capitalist,_ while someone who utilizes physical capital is an _entrepreneur_ or _manager._ Japan s economic development was supported not by capitalists as in Britain, but by entrepreneurs.

 

Shibusawa and Godai were not Large Landowners

The word _capital_ originally denotes physical capital or means of production (land, machinery, factories, etc.). In Japan, it is commonly called_human capital._ This is a characteristic Japanese usage and it is unlikely that there are any Japanese people who would question it. The importance of human resources for a business manager is so axiomatic that it hardly needs to be reiterated, underlining the fact that human resources has always been the driving force behind economic development in Japan. Rather than ownership of capital and the means of production, the Japanese have always understood the importance of the management that makes use of them.

Where economic growth has been achieved, the importance of business management must have been known from experience. But it was only from the beginning of this century that a theoretical distinction was made between ownership and management in Western society. The first Westerner to directly confront this difference was a maverick economist of genius named Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883_1950). At the age of only twenty-four, Schumpeter made his name in economic circles with the publication of his first book Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen National_nomie (The Essentials of Theoretical Economic), and at the age twenty-nine published his Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung (Theory of Economic Development). This was the first work in the history of economic theory to make a distinction between capitalists and entrepreneurs. Distinguishing between those who have capital and those who have talent for business management, Schumpeter argued that it was not capitalists but entrepreneurs and managers who brought about the development of capitalism. The first edition of this book came out in 1912, which means that until the 20th century it had been assumed in Western society that capitalists who owned land and capital were managers. Capitalists appear in both Adam Smith_s seminal analysis of the British economy, Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776) and in Marx_s Das Kapital, but there is no mention of managers or entrepreneurs in either of them. In Britain, the capitalists who owned the land, capital and means of production constituted the driving force behind the economy. In short, there was no separation between ownership and management.

1912 was the 45th year of the Meiji era. Japan had already won wars against China and Russia and had become one of the world_s five great powers and the first capitalist country in Asia. If one had to identify two leading figures who built the foundations of Japanese capitalism in the Meiji era, they would undoubtedly be Shibusawa Eiichi (1840_1931) in the Kanto district (eastern Japan) and Godai Tomoatsu (1835_85) in the Kansai district (western Japan).

Born in Musashi Province (now Saitama Prefecture), Shibusawa Eiichi came from a farming family. In 1864, during the final years of the Tokugawa shogunate, he was enlisted as a retainer of the Hitotsubashi family. Becoming a masterless samurai after the Meiji Restoration, Shibusawa gained appointment to the Ministry of Finance in the Meiji government. He resigned from this post in 1873 and worked in private enterprise until his death, establishing modern businesses in areas such as banking, spinning, and rail transport. During his lifetime, Shibusawa was involved in setting up more than 500 companies. Nevertheless, he held less than 3% of the stock of Dai-Ichi Bank, which was his own direct affiliate.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,508位
(32,645成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
6,188

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年10月24日

関連する他の成果物

1.「SYLFF WORKING PAPERS NO.15」ビデオ (http://www.princeton.edu/duke)
2.東京財団1999年度年次報告書(和文)
3.東京財団1999年年次報告書(英文)
4.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第1回オープニングセッション?
5.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第2回世界の人々のアイデンティティ作りに役立つマンガ・アニメ?
6.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第3回マンガ・アニメ産業の存立基盤はSOHOにあり?
7.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第4回日本製マンガ・アニメが高い価値で世界市場で流通し日本にとっての収益源となるために、いま何が必要か?
8.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第5回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイスは地方からスタートする?
9.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第6回日本製マンガ・アニメが更に発展するには何が必要か?
10.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第7回文化のローカライゼーション?
11.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第8回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイムは地方からスタートする?
12.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第9回キャラクタービジネスのパースペクティブ?
13.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第11回ポップカルチャーが作る新しい勢力図?
14.世界都市東京フォーラム「技術からの考案」会議録
15.世界都市東京フォーラム「歴史と文化からの考案」会議録
16.「日米韓安全保障協力:平時と有事の想定」
17.「米中両国にとっての朝鮮半島?日本の対朝鮮半島政策への含意」
18.Japan’s New Middle Eastern Policy
19.Policy Analysis Review
20.英文冊子 Intellectual Cabinet 2000
21.「国会におけるODA基本法の論議と地方自治体による援助の重要性」
22.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.18 「日本の外交安全保障戦略を考える」
23.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.19 「NPO法施行後の現状と課題」
24.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.23 「ビジネスモデルを通じた産業のダイナミズム」
25.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.26 「国民参加型外交の可能性と課題」
26.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.27 「これからの朝鮮半島の行方」
27.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.28 「マスコミによる経済事象の選択と報道」
28.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.29 「陳水扁新政権下の台湾政治」
29.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.30 「朝鮮半島の将来に日本が貢献できること」
30.「政策シリーズ」第18号「霞ヶ関1府12省体制は行革の決定通り進んでいるか?」
31.「政策シリーズ」第20号「金融監督政策の方向性について」
32.「政策シリーズ」第21号「COP6に向けた我が国の取り組み」
33.平成11年度里親研修会テキスト
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から