日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

海洋文化・文明に関する調査報告書(英文)

 事業名 基盤整備
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


Otsuka argued that Robinson Crusoe_s approach to life was the outward flesh-and-blood manifestation of an ethos that was ingrained in every Englishman at that time. A man like Crusoe, who planned his life rationally and worked diligently, was thus the epitome of modern man and the appearance of such self-sufficient individuals was the basis of modern society.

The problem here is whether a man like Robinson Crusoe can be held up as a standard-bearer for capitalism. Crusoe builds enclosures on a desert island, views this land as his own, and manages his domain efficiently. After living there for 27 years, he refers to himself as the lord of the island. In this sense, he has acquired the rights of a capitalist as the owner of the means of production. In his twenty-fourth year as a castaway, Crusoe helps a native who arrived on the island, a young man from the Caribbean whom he calls Man Friday. Crusoe teaches Man Friday English and the Bible, but makes no attempt to learn a single word of Man Friday_s language and treats him as a slave. This attitude well reflects the character of the British in the days when they ruled one fourth of the land and population of the world. Traditionally, Japan has viewed this British attitude towards land as the standard and taken the establishment of private land ownership rights as the key to modernization. The greatest bone of contention in the debate on Japanese capitalism is the evaluation of the Land Tax Reform Law of 1873. Opinions are divided into the two opposing camps of the Rono group who claim that modern land ownership was established with the Land Tax Reform Law and the Koza group who argue that the Law was half modern and half feudal because it did not abolish payment in kind by tenant farmers. Otsuka took the latter view, but regardless of the position they took on the Land Tax Reform Law, this did not affect the firm belief of both groups that land ownership constitutes the basis of modern society.

But is the establishment of exclusive private ownership really the cornerstone of modern economic development? According to Alan MacFarlane in his study The Origins of English Individualism, land was not owned in common but exclusively owned by individuals long before the modern era in Britain. The British believed that land ownership was a guarantee of freedom and had a characteristic cultural tradition of exclusive private ownership. However, to posit this ancient custom of exclusive land ownership as the basis of modernization is to overestimate its importance. Contemporary Russia approved private ownership based on the advice of British and American experts, but with chaotic results, while China has succeeded in achieving economic development without abolishing the public ownership of land. It must therefore be concluded that private ownership is not a necessary condition for modernization.

 

Development Resulting from the Samurai_s _Freedom of Non-ownership_

The samurai were originally landed feudal lords who directly managed their domains, as indicated by the old appellation jizamurai (landed samurai). From the end of the Sengoku period (1467_1568) to the beginning of the Edo era, a separation occurred between the roles and lives of the peasant and warrior classes. During the Sengoku period, samurai became specialized as organized fighting groups and were increasingly compelled to take up residence in castle towns. This process was promoted further by the warlords Oda Nobunaga (1534_82) and Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1537_98). In 1588, Hideyoshi carried out his famous _sword hunt,_ in which peasants were prohibited from carrying weapons or moving to another village. As a result, Japan_s social system in the Edo era was diametrically opposed to that of Britain: the peasants (workers) owned the means of production and the samurai (managers) were deprived of it. In Britain the division was between capitalists and workers, but in Japan it was between managers and workers.

As we have seen, Marx used the term _primitive accumulation_ to describe the process whereby peasants are deprived of their land and become propertyles

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,508位
(32,645成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
6,188

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年10月24日

関連する他の成果物

1.「SYLFF WORKING PAPERS NO.15」ビデオ (http://www.princeton.edu/duke)
2.東京財団1999年度年次報告書(和文)
3.東京財団1999年年次報告書(英文)
4.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第1回オープニングセッション?
5.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第2回世界の人々のアイデンティティ作りに役立つマンガ・アニメ?
6.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第3回マンガ・アニメ産業の存立基盤はSOHOにあり?
7.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第4回日本製マンガ・アニメが高い価値で世界市場で流通し日本にとっての収益源となるために、いま何が必要か?
8.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第5回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイスは地方からスタートする?
9.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第6回日本製マンガ・アニメが更に発展するには何が必要か?
10.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第7回文化のローカライゼーション?
11.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第8回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイムは地方からスタートする?
12.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第9回キャラクタービジネスのパースペクティブ?
13.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第11回ポップカルチャーが作る新しい勢力図?
14.世界都市東京フォーラム「技術からの考案」会議録
15.世界都市東京フォーラム「歴史と文化からの考案」会議録
16.「日米韓安全保障協力:平時と有事の想定」
17.「米中両国にとっての朝鮮半島?日本の対朝鮮半島政策への含意」
18.Japan’s New Middle Eastern Policy
19.Policy Analysis Review
20.英文冊子 Intellectual Cabinet 2000
21.「国会におけるODA基本法の論議と地方自治体による援助の重要性」
22.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.18 「日本の外交安全保障戦略を考える」
23.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.19 「NPO法施行後の現状と課題」
24.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.23 「ビジネスモデルを通じた産業のダイナミズム」
25.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.26 「国民参加型外交の可能性と課題」
26.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.27 「これからの朝鮮半島の行方」
27.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.28 「マスコミによる経済事象の選択と報道」
28.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.29 「陳水扁新政権下の台湾政治」
29.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.30 「朝鮮半島の将来に日本が貢献できること」
30.「政策シリーズ」第18号「霞ヶ関1府12省体制は行革の決定通り進んでいるか?」
31.「政策シリーズ」第20号「金融監督政策の方向性について」
32.「政策シリーズ」第21号「COP6に向けた我が国の取り組み」
33.平成11年度里親研修会テキスト
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から