6.
The period within which an appeal against the judgement of the High Court may be made shall be 1 week.
7.
A judgement cancelling involvement by the state shall be effective against the administrative agencies concerned.
8.
In the case of a suit under paragraph 1 of this article seeking the cancellation of involvement by the state, notwithstanding the stipulations of paragraph 1 of article 43 of the Administrative Litigation Law, the stipulations of paragraph 2 of article 8, the body of paragraph 1 of article 11, and articles 12 to 22, 25 to 29, 31, 32 and 34 of the same law shall not apply mutatis mutandis.
9.
In the case of a suit under paragraph 1 of this article seeking confirmation of illegal negligence by the state, notwithstanding the stipulations of 3 of article 43 of the Administrative Litigation Law, paragraph 2 of article 40 and paragraph 2 of article 41 of the same law shall not apply mutatis mutandis.
10.
The provisory clauses of paragraph 1 of article 11 of the Administrative Litigation Law shall apply mutatis mutandis to those suits under paragraph 1 of this article which seek confirmation of illegal negligence by the state.
11.
With the exception of those matters laid down in the preceding paragraphs, all necessary matters relating to the expediting of the legal hearings, such as time limits on pleading and submission of evidence, etc., shall be determined by the regulations of the Supreme Court.
(Instigation of legal action with regard to involvement by the To, Do, Fu or Ken )
Article 252-1.
The mayor or other executive organ of a city, town or village that has made application for investigation in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2 of article 250-13 may when any of the items listed below are applicable, bring before the High Court a suit against the administrative agency of the To, Do, Fu or Ken against which the application for investigation was made, requesting the cancellation of the illegal involvement by the To, Do, Fu or Ken to which the application for the said investigation related, or confirmation of the illegality of the negligence by the To, Do, Fu or Ken to which the application for the said investigation related:
1. When the city, town or village is dissatisfied with the results of the investigation or the recommendations of the local dispute arbitrators in accordance with paragraph 1 or 2 of article 250-14 applied mutatis mutandis in line with paragraph 5 of article 251-3 or in accordance with paragraph 3 of article 250-14 applied mutatis mutandis in line with paragraph 6 of article 251-3.
