日本財団 図書館


NAV 44/7/6

5    Because official charts are used in RCDS, mariners can be assured of the same high levels of reliability, quality and acceptance of liability that national Hydrographic Offices provide for both their paper charts and their ENCs. Like official paper charts and ENCs, RNCs are backed by a comprehensive update service, which ensures that they can be kept up to date.

Performance Standards

6    Proposed Performance Standards for RCDS were discussed at NAV43 (NAV43/WP.2). Because a number of concerns were expressed about the system, the Sub-Committee felt that further investigation was warranted.

7    The sponsors of this paper fully support the view that any genuine safety issues associated with the use of RCDS should be thoroughly investigated and have taken action to obtain additional feed-back from users on the specific topics raised at NAV 43. There is now an increasing number of RNC users available to provide this feedback.

8    Draft RCDS Performance Standards which take the form of either a stand-alone document or an RCDS Appendix to the ECDIS Performance Standards (Resolution A.817(19)) have been prepared by the IM0/IHO Harmonization Group on ECDIS (HGE), and the IHO respectively. The proposed standards call for the use of official raster data in an ECDIS in circumstances where ENC data has not yet been produced.

9    An important benefit of“dual-fuel”is that sophisticated electronic chart navigation relying entirely on official, government backed and up-to-date, electronic charts can be provided immediately for almost any voyage. The alternative is for mariners to wait some years more before ENCS are available for many areas of the world.

Feedback from RNC Trials

10   A growing number of vessels of all types and classes, now use raster chart systems. These vessels operate throughout the world under a wide range of navigational conditions. A number of these vessels are being used by the sponsors of this paper to evaluate RNC navifgation and RCDS.

11   Based on the experience gained from the sea trials, it is clear that mariners believe that the continuous display of a vessel's position on a chart image is of great benefit. In particular, a number of high speed ferry operators find that RCDS provides the real-time navigation display which is essential for the operation of their vessels. Automatic plotting also frees the mariner for other important navigation-related tasks such as maintaining a safe lookout and collision avoidance.

12   One important difference between ECDIS and RCDS is that RCDS does not enable the selection or removal of layers of data, nor does the RNC data itsel ftrigger automatic alarms and waming's. However, RNC users report that this is not a problem, as the equipment provides the capability for critical areas and safety contours to be highlighted manually to trigger appropriate alarms. This is a significant advantage over the paper chart.

13   The system only displays a portion of a chart at any one time However RCDS like ECDIS minimises this effect. In particular, it is possible to call up smaller scale charts (providing a larger viewing area) or larger scale charts (providing more detail) almost instantaneously and all charted notes can be reviewed simply and quickly, irrespective of their position on the chart. As an extra safeguard, the proposed RCDS Performance Standard calls for a limited number of paper charts to be carried and used as a reference during a voyage.

 

I:/NAV/44/7-6.WPD

 

 

 

前ページ   目次へ   次ページ

 






日本財団図書館は、日本財団が運営しています。

  • 日本財団 THE NIPPON FOUNDATION