5. CONCLUSION
Authors performed the experimental training according to the same training program both by onboard SMS and by training ship in order to asses the possibility and the effect of the training for cadets combined onboard simulator training and onboard training. From the results of the questionnaire to cadets and the scoring of ship-handling technique of cadets by instructors, following conclusions were obtained.
The training method combined onboard simulator training and onboard training is effective to improve ship handling technique of cadets. Onboard SMS is useful for cadets to practice such elemental techniques for ship handling as planning, positioning, maneuvering. communication and management technique. Therefore, in training ship. it is recommended to use SMS for the verification of maneuvering plan and the advance practice of training.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to Prof. Y. ARAI. Marine Technical College, and Dr. N.TAKAGI. Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine. for their useful suggestion that improved the presentation of the paper. and instructors of the training ship Seiun Maru for their all assistance to carry out the onboard experiment.
REFERENCES
[1] KOBAYASHI. H., "Development of Ship Handling Technique into Elemental Techniques and Proposed of the Education/Training Method Utilizing a Ship Handling Simulator". The journal of Japan Institute of Navigation. Commemorative Issue of 50th Anniversary, 1998
[2] ARAI. Y. and FUJII. T., "The Utilities and Possibilities on the Ship Maneuvering Simulator Training", Navigation, No.127, Japan Institute of Navigation. 1996 (Japanese)
[3] MURATA. S. and KOBAYASHI. H., "Comparative Studies between the Onboard Training and the Simulator-used Training". Proceedings of International Navigation Simulator Lecturer's Conference 11th, 2000
[4] ARAI. Y. et al. "Study on the Grading of the Bridge Simulator Training for the Deck Officer", Review of the Marine Technical College. No.40, 1997 (Japanese)
[5] KOBAYASHI. H. et al, "Proposal for Educational and Training Curricula Using Ship Handling Simulator", Journal of Japan Institute of Navigation. Vol.96, 1997 (Japanese)
Appendix
Outline of Compact-Sized Ship Maneuvering Simulator I-SIM (Model SMS-EC 110 Series)
1. Features
This Compact-sized ship-maneuvering simulator is designed to be used as an educational training simulator. The size of this simulator is small to fit in the existing school room and function is almost the same as of full-sized ship maneuvering simulator. The purpose of this simulator is that the trainees can carry out nautical training exercises on land efficiently, instead of going out the sea.
To achieve this purpose. this simulator is provided with the following characteristics.
(1) The typical navigation equipments such as steering wheel, engine telegraph, etc,. are real equipments in order to get trainees to be familiarized with this operation.
(2) The CGI(Computer Generated Imaginary) based visual system is supplied in order to give trainees realistic sea-scapes.
(3) The own and target ship's models are made by accurate hydrodynamic mathematical model and the characteristics of maneuverability can give trainees the real ship dynamics.
(4) Output sound of the own ship's environmental noise and own and other ship's horn give the trainee reality.
The operation method of this simulator is easy, so that the special operator will not be needed. Therefore, the trainee can use it himself at the time of their demand. Various training scenarios are supplied and the trainee can select it effectively, according to the educational curriculum, which matches trainee's ability. Thus. Compact-size simulator has advantages in systematic and repeated training more economically and safely.
2. Components of Simulator
Components of this simulator are (1) Simulator section and (2) Instructor's section shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Equipment Layout of Compact Type SMS
(1) Simulator section
The simulator is consisting of following three sub-sections.
-> Operation sub-section
-> Control sub-section
-> Visual display sub-section
This simulator is designed that the all operations for training can be carried out by 'Auxiliary control panel fitted on the Simulator section. Therefore, the trainee can use this simulator by himself without trainer 's assistance.
(2) Instructor's section
The instructor's section is consisting of instructor 's monitor. electronics chart generator and its monitor display, instructor 's control panel and other equipments. The function of instructor's section is as follows.
-> Initializing a training scenario
-> Starting and stopping the simulation
-> Monitoring the visual display image
-> Setting sea conditions and other environmental conditions
-> Recording the result of training exercises
-> producing the training scenarios
The basic feature of compact-sized simulator is trainee's individual training as mentioned above. but it can be expanded to the team training by using the optional remote wheel stand. This remote wheel stand is a portable box type having the small wheel handle connecting to the simulation section by the connection cable.
When using this remote wheel stand, the four (4) trainee's team training formation, composed the Captain, 1st Officer (1/O), 3rd Officer (3/O) and Quarter Master (Q/M), can be realized. The Figure 2 shows the arrangement of Trainees for both Single training (A) and Group training (B).
Fig.2 Arrangement of Trainee at SMS Training
A; Single Training
B; Group Training
3. Mathematical model for maneuvering motion
Ship's maneuvering motion is simulated base on the MMG type mathematical model, which describes the four-degrees of coupled motions as follows
Where,
m, Izz, Ixx : Mass and mass moment of inertia for each axis
mx, my, Jzz, Jxx: Added mass and mass moment of inertia for each axis
u, v, r, : Axial speed, lateral speed, rate of turn, roll angle
The terms on the right side with subscripts H,P,R mean hull force, propeller force, and rudder force. Subscripts 'Wind', 'Wave', 'Current' mean a wind force, wave drifting force and additional inertial force generated by current. In addition, six degree of ship motion by wave is added to the maneuvering motion to increase the reality.
Among number of ship handling aspects, skill-full handling will be required in harbor. which includes departure. arrival and berthing operation under the complicated traffics and external disturbances. To simulate such maneuvering motion in harbor. special attention was paid for the expression of ruder, propeller and hull interaction at low speed. Fig.3 shows a classification of rudder force model under the various propeller operation and ship speed(1).
Fig.3 Classification of rudder models
T: Propeller thrust, u: Axial Component of Ship Velocity |
T1,T2: Adopted Values to Change Mathematical Models |
The accuracy of simulation depends on how each hydrodynamic force can be calculated precisely. To attain a most precise simulation results for Seiun-Maru, hydrodynamic parameters included in hull, propeller and ruder models are derived from captive model tests (CMT) and open water tests. Wind and current force coefficient are also derived from wind tunnel test and captive model test with large drift angles.
The accuracy of the mathematical model for Seiun-Maru was confirmed by the comparison of simulation with actual ship's trial results.
As an example, comparison between simulated crash stop astern motion and trial results are shown in Fig,4. Although the time-history of ship's heading indicates some discrepancy between calculation and measurement, predicted stopping distance and change of ship speed shows a good agreement to each other. Comparison for accelerating turn motion is also shown in Fig.4. Simulated time-history for ship's heading and speed well coincide with trial results which leads to the conclusion that present simulation model can represent the ship's motion accurately.
In addition to the Seiun-Maru. VLCC and Container ship can be selected as an own ship whose mathematical models were established by the same manner as Seiun-Maru. Three-target ship models are also prepared for this simulator, which are tabulated in Table 1.
Fig.4 Comparison between Simulation and Teial results
Table 1 Models of Own ship and Target Ship
Own Ship Model (5) |
Target Ship Model (3) |
(1) Seiun Maru |
(1) 200,000 DWT VLOC |
(2) 200,000 DMT VLOC (Fuji) |
(2) 25,000 DWT General Cargo Ship |
(3) 200,000 DWT VLOC (Ballast) |
(3) 10 GT Fishing Boat |
(4) 3,600 TEU Container (Full) |
|
(5) 3,600 TEU Container (Ballast) |
|
|
4. Sea area Database
The outside-view from trainees, which displays on the visual display unit, is as follows.
(1) Displayed image
-> Sea and sky
-> Target ships
-> Coastlines and the harbor entrance
-> Bow part of own ship
-> Fixed model (buoy. Light house. etc.)
(2) Characteristics
-> Day in clear weather
-> Night in clear weather
-> Twilight in clear weather
-> Day in fog (visibility is variable from 0 to 4.0 NM)
For the sea area and displayed images, database prepared for Seiun-Maru is tabulated in Table 2.
Table 2 Sea Area Database and Displayed Image
Sea Area Database (5) |
Displayed Image |
(1) Seiun Maru Training Area
(Mikawa-wan) |
Fixed Objects (Buoy, etc,.) (10type) |
Bow Part of Own ship (5type) |
(2) Open Sea |
Target Ships (3type) |
(3) Imaginary Port & Coastal Area |
* 10 Target ships are able to display simultaneously |
(4) Uraga-suido Traffic Route |
|
(5) Bisan-seto East Traffic Route |
|
|
Reference :
(1):SHOJI. K. et al. 'Hydrodynamic Forces and Rudder Interaction at Low Speed'. Proceedings of MARSIM90. 1990
AUTHOR'S BIOGRAPHY
Hideo Yabuki. Professor. some 3O years of seafarers education and training experience onboard training ships (Diesel engine ships. Steam turbine ships and Sailing ships) as instructor and master.
|