MIF 2002
A report on Ship Recycling was presented to the MIF on behalf of AWES. The MIF assembly did not discuss the presentation and there were no questions. The MIF considered the subject closed for the time being.
A new topic ENVIRONMENT has been created under the Manufacturing area. The WG on SSCS agreed to take this matter under is responsibility and to prepare the corresponding presentation for the 2003 MIF, adding it to the Work Program. The contents of the presentation should in principle be based on items in the Work Program, to be agreed with shipowners, equipment manufacturers, EU Commission etc.
EU MEASURES FOR MARINE SAFETY - ERIKA I AND II PACKAGES
During the second half of 2002, the Erika-2 package of measures came into force, following the Erika-1 package earlier in the year. This package includes the following measures:
・Directive on the Establishment of a Community monitoring, control and information system for marine traffic.
・EU Regulation Creating the European Maritime Safety Agency.
The EU did not approve the establishment of a fund for compensation of oil pollution in European waters and related measures. The was taken to the IMO and has finally bee approved in May 2003 as a supplementary third tier of cover under the International Oil Pollution Compensation Convention.
Of these new regulations, none is foreseen to have a major direct impact on shipbuilding. The traffic directive requires installing initially transponders and later on voyage data recorders on ships, but this will represent minor work for repair and newbuilding yards. The EMSA is discussed here below
EUROPEAN MARITIME SAFETY AGENCY (EMSA)
EMSA. main roles are:
・Monitor the overall functioning of the Community Port state Control regime.
・Provide the Commission with the technical assistance necessary to take part in the work of technical bodies of the Paris MOU.
・Assist the Commission in monitoring and auditing the work of classification societies.
・Provide the Commission and Member States with reliable and comparable information and data on marine safety
・Carry out tasks related to the surveillance of navigation and marine traffic as laid down in the Directive.
・Develop a common methodology for the investigation of marine accidents and carry out an analysis of existing accident investigation reports.
・Organise appropriate training activities in areas related to port state and flag state administration.
・Provide technical assistance and training to future EU members as regards the implementation of Community legislation in the field of maritime safety.
The WG noted with distress that no shipbuilding representatives will be appointed by the EU Commission to the Board of EMSA. It was agreed that our industry is a fundamental part of the maritime industries, arguably representing the highest technical know-how in the business. Since class societies aren't represented either, the future Board will have a lower technical profile than is considered necessary.
Subsequently, the Commission suggested that technical participation can take place better at lower level, since the Board will be entirely political. Therefore, the Commission asked CESA to set up a shipbuilders' advisory committee to support EMSA on technical matters. This was confirmed in the course of Leadership 2014 WG4 work.
"PRESTIGE" DISASTER
The importance of the MT "Prestige" disaster was recognised by the WG. The WG agreed to adopt a 'high profile' policy denouncing older tanker conditions. The WG agreed that:
a. Current regulations might have to be enhanced, but the main short-term emphasis should be on enforcement, since it is seriously deficient. Shipbuilders should be critical of the enforcement system.
b. Ships trading to EU and neighbouring seas cannot continue to be designed, built, repaired and certificated just about anywhere. Some limits must be set to this total lack of control. Future work should determine where in particular are these limits to be set at.
c. The best forum for development of regulations is the IMO, but this organisation is not capable of ensuring enforcement. Therefore, the EU and member states should be entrusted with the main enforcement efforts. Shipbuilders should put the emphasis on work at the EU, supporting a strong EMSA, building up a EU Coast Guard.
d. Law enforcement is Government business, and entities compromised by economic interests cannot do a proper job. The EU single market requires a single enforcement policy throughout the EU. Surveyors, class societies and ports are exposed to economic pressures and therefore cannot be expected to bear the main weight in enforcement tasks.
The WG then discussed and agreed a draft Press Release on the MT "Prestige" disaster, to be submitted to the SC for approval and publication. Subsequently, Mr Granger sent a very good letter-to-the-editor on the subject for Lloyd's List.
The subsequent measures taken by the EU are fully supported by the WG, including the accelerated elimination of the remaining SH tankers, and the immediate prohibition to carry heavy oils in SH ships all over EU waters. The extension of EU measures to ships down to 600 dwt was also supported, subject to a capacity study that was carried out with satisfactory results (i.e. there is ample shipbuilding capacity for the phase-out at all ship sizes).
SAFETY OF BULK-CARRIERS
Losses of major bulk carriers continue at a disturbing rate. IACS has taken the initiative with two packages of measures, which are being endorsed by most shipowners. The most radical proposal includes double sides for cargo holds.
AWES has in the past endorsed measures to improve vessel safety arrangements, with the proviso that existing ships should also have to comply with them in the shortest practicable time. Grandfathering provisions should be as limited as possible.
CO-OPERATION WITH METAL-WORKER UNIONS
The WG reviewed a paper on marine safety prepared by the EU metal-worker unions and suggested some improvements. In general, the union's views and most of its proposals are shared by shipbuilders, even if some of the ideas are somehow impractical.
Chapter VI. AWES Statistics 2002
SHIPBUILDING IN AWES COUNTRIES DURING THE YEAR 2002 IN GT
COUNTRY |
Orderbook |
Completions |
New Orders |
Cancellations |
CROATIA |
39 |
1,261,276 |
17 |
417,041 |
6 |
117,099 |
|
|
DENMARK |
16 |
29,967 |
15 |
431,322 |
8 |
6,770 |
|
|
FINLAND |
6 |
457,733 |
6 |
296,988 |
3 |
147,633 |
|
|
FRANCE |
43 |
504,787 |
19 |
254,639 |
34 |
66,738 |
|
|
GERMANY |
119 |
1,935,014 |
68 |
1,282,901 |
50 |
813,290 |
|
|
GREECE |
4 |
35,391 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
ITALY |
40 |
1,462,847 |
18 |
646,052 |
12 |
231,999 |
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
147 |
473,850 |
106 |
280,850 |
112 |
265,550 |
|
|
NORWAY |
76 |
354,071 |
77 |
278,934 |
28 |
46,209 |
|
|
POLAND |
51 |
1,744,254 |
30 |
589,606 |
27 |
760,890 |
33 |
930,178 |
PORTUGAL* |
18 |
53,491 |
1 |
1,800 |
13 |
23,611 |
|
|
ROMANIA |
14 |
126,816 |
12 |
148,496 |
4 |
38,050 |
4 |
28,752 |
SPAIN |
78 |
770,468 |
52 |
206,265 |
48 |
178,366 |
|
|
U. KINGDOM* |
15 |
33,527 |
4 |
28,302 |
9 |
3,228 |
|
|
TOTAL |
666 |
9,243,492 |
425 |
4,863,195 |
354 |
2,699,433 |
37 |
958,930 |
|
SHIPBUILDING IN AWES COUNTRIES DURING THE YEAR 2002 IN CGT
COUNTRY |
Orderbook |
Completions |
New Orders |
Cancellations |
CROATIA |
39 |
859,629 |
17 |
317,307 |
6 |
99,977 |
|
|
DENMARK |
16 |
80,138 |
15 |
315,935 |
8 |
24,382 |
|
|
FINLAND |
6 |
543,595 |
6 |
358,350 |
3 |
155,970 |
|
|
FRANCE |
43 |
686,336 |
19 |
353,205 |
34 |
110,214 |
|
|
GERMANY |
119 |
1,911,772 |
68 |
1,229,022 |
50 |
742,170 |
|
|
GREECE |
4 |
57,800 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
ITALY |
40 |
1,687,392 |
18 |
650,765 |
12 |
292,570 |
|
|
NETHERLANDS |
147 |
757,220 |
106 |
467,575 |
112 |
472,850 |
|
|
NORWAY |
76 |
663,200 |
77 |
558,599 |
28 |
144,623 |
|
|
POLAND |
51 |
1,232,029 |
30 |
497,563 |
27 |
554,285 |
33 |
751,369 |
PORTUGAL* |
18 |
73,766 |
1 |
3,330 |
13 |
34,266 |
|
|
ROMANIA |
14 |
149,880 |
12 |
148,587 |
4 |
42,470 |
4 |
33,660 |
SPAIN |
78 |
782,037 |
52 |
301,229 |
48 |
264,004 |
|
|
U. KINGDOM* |
15 |
52,094 |
4 |
35,051 |
9 |
11,527 |
|
|
TOTAL |
666 |
9,536,888 |
425 |
5,236,519 |
354 |
2,949,308 |
37 |
785,029 |
|
Source: AWES
* Estimated
DEVELOPING OF COMPLETIONS 1998 - 2002
|
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
CROATIA N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
|
|
|
|
17 317,307 266,117 448 374 |
DENMARK N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
16 334,196 90,290 641 0 |
14 371,514 58,800 754 0 |
12 275,701 21,140 538 0 |
13 252,308 0 631 0 |
15 315,935 0 484 0 |
FINLAND N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in MEuro |
9 284,380 264,380 875 800 |
6 280,040 264,040 833 790 |
2 279,625 279,625 908 908 |
5 462,350 462,350 1,023 1,023 |
6 358,350 358,350 1,171 1,171 |
FRANCE N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
16 233,458 195,532 626 526 |
26 248,087 36,247 819 114 |
38 342,628 290,973 1,098 930 |
24 459,897 378,493 1,450 1,150 |
19 353,205 324,674 1,100 1,030 |
GERMANY N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
92 1,085,797 467,375 2,570 1,124 |
67 866,578 506,651 2,084 1,307 |
63 976,078 672,722 2,329 1,654 |
53 1,064,928 690,199 3,011 2,177 |
68 1,229,022 863,406 3,416 2,657 |
GREECE N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Exort in mEuro |
0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
ITALY N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
35 788,983 365,475 2,570 1,320 |
50 776,654 324,890 2,604 1,161 |
29 543,699 453,595 1,829 1,574 |
23 522,955 368,669 1,406 935 |
18 650,765 537,790 1,815 1,507 |
NETHERLANDS N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
97 521,425 277,010 997 537 |
128 600,590 323,810 1,168 680 |
157 587,335 411,155 1,163 815 |
111 496,780 279,530 967 592 |
106 467,575 298,245 950 679 |
NORWAY N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export inmEuro |
67 414,535 196,706 1,274 716
|
71 464,070 151,950 1,577 781 |
56 373,487 171,272 1,115 533 |
64 446,160 159,082 1,626 580 |
77 558,599 157,368 1,654 466 |
POLAND N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
37 517,593 509,083 915 900 |
34 456,562 454,242 925 921 |
34 502,530 493,854 897 890 |
28 477,560 475,834 784 780 |
30 497,563 497,563 759 759 |
PORTUGAL N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
12 37,700 0 71 0 |
4 57,774 0 10 0 |
5 56,259 38,982 96 66 |
9 29,801 0 70 0 |
1 3,330 0 6 0 |
ROMANIA N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 0 |
22 153,805 153,805 257 257 |
9 105,126 105,126 186 186 |
12 148,587 148,587 272 272 |
SPAIN N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
86 405,493 348,449 1,057 947 |
45 348,987 306,395 949 837 |
58 400,411 323,555 1,150 964 |
62 289,629 133,206 954 512 |
52 301,229 156,191 934 566 |
UNITED KINGDOM N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
20 120,055 0 278 0 |
10 52,356 31,626 140 79 |
13 51,595 0 180 0 |
11 33,409 0 89 0 |
4 35,051 0 81 0 |
AWES TOTAL N0 CGT - Export Total value in mEuro - Export in mEuro |
487 4,743,615 2,714,300 11,874 6,870 |
455 4,523,212 2,458,651 11,863 6,670 |
489 4,543,153 3,310,678 11,560 8,591 |
412 4,640,902 3,052,489 12,197 7,935 |
425 5,236,518 3,608,291 13,090 9,482 |
|
|