SEMO9/O1B
The 9th Seminar
Brisbane, 11 - 13 September 2002
Agenda item 1
PROGRESS REPORT ON ACTIVITIES OF TOKYO MOU*
Submitted by the Secretariat
ACTIVITIES OF TOKYO MOU
1 The Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region or the Tokyo MOU, was concluded and signed at the Tokyo meeting on 1 December 1993 by 18 maritime Authorities in the Asia-Pacific region, namely, Australia, Canada, China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea. Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Russian Federation, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam.
Members of the Tokyo MOU
2 According to paragraph 8.6 of the Memorandum, those Authorities that has signed and formally accepted the Memorandum become Members of the MOU. Until present, with the exception of the Solomon Islands, 17 Authorities have signed and accepted the MOU and thus are full Members of the Tokyo MOU (on the date of acceptance in parentheses):
Japan (1 April 1994)
Malaysia (1 April 1994)
Papua New Guinea (1 April 1994)
Republic of Korea (7 April 1994)
Singapore (9 April 1994)
Australia (11 April 1994)
China (11 April 1994)
Hong Kong, China (11 April 1994)
New Zealand (11 April 1994)
Canada (l5 April 1994)
Vanuatu (26 April 1994)
Russian Federation (1 April 1995)
Indonesia (1 April 1996)
Thailand (1 May 1996)
Fiji (1 June 1996)
Philippines (9 September 1997)
Viet Nam (1 January 1999)
In accordance with paragraph 8.2 of the Memorandum, the following Authority has become the 18th Member Authority:
Chile (10 June 2002)
* This paper was prepared based on the submission to the 2nd Workshop for regional PSC Agreement Secretaries and Directors of Information Centres held at IMO Headquarters, London - 3 to 5 July 2002.
The Secretariat and the Database Centre
3 The Tokyo MOU came into effect on 1 April 1994. A permanent secretariat (called the Tokyo MOU Secretariat) was established in Tokyo as an independent body to serve the Port State Control Committee and became operational in April 1994.
The Asia-Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS) was established in Canada to maintain records for port State inspections, but this function was transferred to the database centre in Vladivostok, the Russian Federation, effective on 1 January 2000.
Port State Control Committee
4 The Port State Control Committee is the executive body of the Tokyo MOU established under the Memorandum. It monitors and controls the operation and effectiveness of the MOU and takes decisions on policy, administrative and technical matters relating to the operation of the MOU. The Committee consists of the above-mentioned eighteen member Authorities and observers from Brunei Darussalam, Solomon Islands, the United States Coast Guard, International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Labour Organization (ILO), the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), the Paris MOU and Indian Ocean MOU Secretariats.
Up to the present, the Committee has been held eleven meetings; namely:
1st meeting |
11-14 April 1994 |
Beijing, China |
2nd meeting |
16-19 January 1995 |
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
3rd meeting |
4-7 December 1995 |
Hong Kong, China |
4th meeting |
30 September-3 October 1996 |
Auckland, New Zealand |
5th meeting |
12-14 August 1997 |
Vladivostok, the Russian Federation |
6th meeting |
2-4 June 1998 |
Seoul, Republic of Korea |
7th meeting |
26-29 April 1999 |
Cairns, Australia |
8th meeting |
21-24 February 2000 |
Singapore |
9th meeting |
13-15 November 2000 |
Nadi, Fiji |
10th meeting |
15-18 October 2001 |
Tokyo, Japan |
11th meeting |
10-13 June 2002 |
Manila, Philippines |
The 12th meeting of the Committee is scheduled to be held in Valparaiso, Chile from 21-27 March 2003.
Work of the Port State Control Committee
5 During the past eleven meetings, the Port State Control Committee took many important decisions concerning the implementation of the Memorandum and uniform practices on port State inspections. Some of the major achievements made by the Committee are briefly described in the following paragraphs.
Target inspection rate
6 Bearing in mind significant difference in the stage of development of port State control activities among the member Authorities in the Asia-Pacific region, it was impracticable to set a single target inspection figure applicable to all Authorities. The regional inspection rate of 50% of the foreign ships visiting the Asia-Pacific ports was originally set out as a target figure to be achieved by 2000.
7 The Committee at its 8th meeting in 2000 reviewed the target regional inspection rate of 50% and agreed to amend the MOU to increase the target regional inspection rate to 75% since the 50% had already reached in 1996.
Revision of the Tokyo MOU and the Manual
8 The MOU initially concluded in Tokyo in 1993 contained in Annexes guidelines for port State control procedures. In 1996, the Committee considered that, taking into account the updating and revisions of port State control procedures in IMO, the MOU should contain only general principle of port State control procedures and administrative provisions, and technical details should be guided by the port Sate control procedures adopted by IMO. The Committee prepared revised MOU deleting Annexes and incorporating new provisions taking into account recent developments in IMO and the Paris MOU. The revised MOU and consequential changes of the Manual were adopted in 1998.
9 In 2001 the Committee adopted further amendment to the MOU and the Manual incorporating resolution A.882(21), revised convention references and other changes and updates.
Asia-Pacific Computerized Information System (APCIS)
10 APCIS was originally located in Canada and operated by the Canadian Coast Guard. In 1998, the Committee recognized the need to modernize the system, using modern communications technology, and proposed new systems using Internet were developed by Canada and the Russian Federation. At its 7th meeting in 1999, the Committee decided that the new APCIS should be located in Vladivostok, the Russian Federation. After preparatory work, APCIS 2000 commenced its operation on 1 January 2000.
Detention list and inspection data
11 The Committee in 1997 decided that a list of detentions of ships should be published in the Tokyo MOU web-site. Initially the detention list was published quarterly, but presently the list is published on a monthly basis.
12 The Committee at 11th meeting agreed to publish all results of PSC inspections on the Tokyo MOU web-site from January 2003.
Guidelines and criteria
13 The Committee has prepared guidelines and criteria for technical and administrative matters, including:
-Criteria for members and observers of the Tokyo MOU,
-Guidelines for the responsibility assessment of recognized organizations,
-Guidelines for control of the ISM Code,
-Guidelines relating to technical co-operation programmes,
-Functionality and specifications of the APCIS 2000.
Concentrated inspection campaign
14 The Authorities of Tokyo MOU have tackled Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) twice as:
-CIC on ISM Code compliance was conducted during the period of July - September 1998 to the date of coming into effect for the International Safety Management Code, concurrently with the Paris MOU.
-CIC on GMDSS requirements was carried out during October - December 1999 in order to facilitate and ensure implementation of GMDSS requirements as they became mandatory for all ships on 1 February 1999.
The 2nd CIC on ISM Code compliance is to conduct from 1 July 2002, when the ISM Code will become fully effective, to 30 September 2002.
Interregional data exchange
15 In April 2001 the data exchange between the APCIS of the Tokyo MOU and the SERENAC of the Paris MOU was launched, so that it has enabled PSCOs in both regions to access the databases each other.
Ship targeting
16 The Committee at its 11th meeting agreed the targeting system to identify ships subject to priority inspection. The system would be implemented on a trial basis, with the target implementation date of 1 January 2003, and be used by member Authorities on a voluntary basis for the time being.
|