64　Ibid., p. 1350, para. 123.

65　Ibid., pp. 1333-1334, para. 30.

66　Ibid., p. 1350, para. 124.

67　Ibid., p. 1352, para. 137.

68　Ibid., p. 1352, para. 138.

69　Separate Opinion of Judge Anderson, ibid., p. 1395 (Arrest of Saiga).

70　Separate Opinion of Judge Vukas, ibid., p. 1402, para. 17.

71　Separate Opinion of Judge Zaho, ibid., pp. 1383-1384.

72　この問題については、森田章夫「排他的経済水域の外延−サイガ号事件(本案判決)の検討を通じて−」『EEZ内における沿岸国管轄権をめぐる国際法及び国内法上の諸問題』日本国際問題研究所(平成12年6月)32-37頁に詳しい。

73　Dissenting Opinion of Judge Park, Nelson, Chandrasekhara Rao, Vukas and Ndiaye, ITLOS Reports 1997, pp. 53-56., paras. 2- 10.

74　Dissenting Opinion of Judge Anderson, ibid., p. 67, para.. 10.

75　Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Wolfrum and Judge Yamamoto, ibid., p. 46, para. 4.

76　E. D. Brown, "The M/V 'Saiga' case on prompt release of detained vessels: the first jurisdiction of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea", Marine Policy, Vol. 22, N0.4-5, pp. 320-322.

77　Dissenting Opinion of Vice-President Wolfrum and Judge Yamamoto,, ITLOS Reports 1997,pp. 46-48., paras. 5-9. 詳しくは、山本「前掲論文」141頁参照。

78　ITLOS Reports 1997, p. 28, para. 53

79　Brown, op. cit., p. 324.

80　Tullio Treves, "The Proceedings Concerning Prompt Release of Vessels and Crews before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea", The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, Vol. 11, N0. 2 (1996), p. 186.

前ページ　　　目次へ　　　次ページ