日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 教育 > 成果物情報

The Suffocation Of HongKong

 事業名 国際的人材育成と研究活動推進のための基金の増額(Further endowment of fund for following-up
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


Ann became part of the Hong Kong establishment and an adviser to the forming Far Eastern Economic Review. He always commented on my regional articles in the Review, like my piece in the 1960s "Tug-of-War on The Korean Peninsula." Re-reading that article, I should have stopped right there. Not so much has changed in obdurate Korea.

Over the years, Ann did his best to salvage the situation between China and Britain. He was after all, Chinese and wanted the best outcome. If he had been 20 years younger he would have been Hong Kong's first CEO instead of Tang Chee-hwa. Ann was known for treating his workers well.

Ann attended my wedding banquet in the Ambassador Hotel--now torn down--which was located behind the present Sheraton Towers. I attended his son Rupert's wedding, one of the most lavish parties ever staged at the Miramar Hotel. John Yue was there, beaming because the tuxedo he tailored for me fit so well.

Ann did his best for Hong Kong and served on the Basic Law drafting committee.

In helping to shape the Review into what in those days (1960s) was Asia's most prestigious and intellectual business-economic journal, Ann made his contribution to a free press.

The point is, in giving glimpses of just two of my old friends in Hong Kong, there are several ways to address the problem. John Yue and T.K. Ann came out of Shanghai as capitalists. Both believed in an emerging great China.

So do I; but if China becomes great, it won't be under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party as we know it today. The party will have to reform radically and lean toward the type of democracy, which is seen on Taiwan.

One of the ways to do this will be in the realm of press freedoms; development in a straight line from the old Review which was Ann's pride and joy instead of a straight line from Xinhua News Agency and the People's Daily, which are burdens to the intellectual equanimity of Ann and a lot of other Hong Kongers.

 

There used to be a saying on the China Coast: "You'll never get anywhere betting against Shanghai." In the 1930s and 1940s Shanghai was the greatest city in Asia and clearly the elder brother to Hong Kong. It was also, by the way, the founding city of the Communist Party but also a key base for Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists. In short, quite a place.

The Communists took over in 1949 and made Shanghai into a great gray glob from which status it has only begun to recover in the 1980s. On my first visit to Shanghai in 1973 I was dismayed at the "disappearance of greatness."

Meanwhile, Hong Kong--spurred by men of dreams like T.K Ann and John Yue-- prospered. By the 1960s Hong Kong had inherited the mantle of the city with the most moxie on the China Coast.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,814位
(32,567成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
4,764

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年9月19日

関連する他の成果物

1.Glossary of Japanese Transport Policy(運輸用語辞典)
2.海と日本 ビデオ第3作「海賊一村上一族盛哀記一」
3.海と日本 ビデオ第4作「北前船奔る」
4.海と日本 ビデオ第5作「琉球の時代」
5.海と日本 ビデオ第6作「マラッカ海峡?世界が出会う海の交差点?」
6.GFRS政策シリーズ第12号「自由党の政策構想と自自連立?鈴木淑夫?」
7.GFRS政策シリーズ第13号「6月の総選挙に向かって?インドネシアの現状と展望?白石隆」
8.GFRS政策シリーズ第14号「東アジア危機とIMF?白井早由里?」
9.GFRS政策シリーズ第15号「銀行セクターの近況と未来?小原由起子?」
10.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.11 「共和党多数議会とクリントン政権の行方、そして日米関係の将来像を模索する ?デビット・ファンダーバーク氏?」
11.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.12 「国を超えたシビル・ソサエティ?オタワ・プロセス、そして今後? ?目加田説子?」
12.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.13 「ノン・プロフィット:アメリカの教育に果たす役割から ?上野真城子?」
13.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.14 「混迷するロシア政局と今後の日ロ関係?岸田芳樹? ?上野真城子?」
14.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.15 「中央省庁等革命問題 ?田中 一昭?」
15.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.16 「日本は何を目指しているのか:日本の安全保障を考える?長島昭久?」
16.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.17 「戦火の果て コソボ紛争 現場から?外岡秀俊?」
17.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.22 「東ティモール問題?その過去と未来、そして世界と日本?貴島正道?」
18.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.24 「パキスタン・クーデター’99?政治的・経済的視点からの分析?小田尚也?」
19.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.25 「新しい文化=芸術を創造するために?市村作知雄?」
20.作品別(月別)実施回数一覧表
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から