NOTE: JMSA agreed to participate in the review for stages I, II and III (AP218 only) for all APs. The Ship Team will ask for more involvement over the exploder
CD documents to Secretariat
・AP 215 2000/02/01
・AP 216 2000/02/01
・AP 217 1999/17/01
・AP 218 2000/02/01
QC N110 is the checklist document for internal review. The quality plan requirements are in 8.8.1 of QC N 111. The plan describes the projects activities, identify what contributions are made to QC, specify the hours allotted to quality work with the project, record the actual hours spent on what tasks, record hours spent by team members related to quality system maintenance. The project should allocate 7.5% of their budget to internal quality tasks and 2.5% of the budget on maintaining the SC4 Quality System (total 10%).
Review to be done in 4 weeks and revision is to be done in the editorial level only, not detailed technical review. These then need to be editorially reviewed in time for the New Orleans meeting. The AP editors have to distribute which checklist questions each reviewer shall work upon. The reviewers have 4 weeks to do the job. Updates should be done before New Orleans meeting. In New Orleans we should review changes and do a consistency check.
For NO agenda:
・Walkthrough of changes to the APs due to review.
・Harmonize conformance classes.
・Harmonize UoFs.
3.3 Configuration Management UoF Mapping (by Uwe Langbecker)
Configuration Management UoF mapping table reviewed and minor changes were made in the reference. The file is in Ship/LH-18.
