Test purposes and primary test cases must be available at time of CD with a N number. This will eventually be the ATS document. At least 2 compilers will need to be used for the internal review and their outlook logs provided.
The Secretariat wants a complete PDF file and PDF files broken into pieces not more that one megabyte. Parts that are not in PDF A4 size hard copy is required. A4 single sided is needed at DIS level and beyond.
QC wants feedback on N document and clause number where there are issues and a proposed solution. They should be sent to the QC exploder. Any errors will result in document being sent back from secretariat. Two bad submissions will result in a Quality audit and workshop. If a document fails a ballot and many of the comments are on document quality issues then that may trigger an audit. Audits from QC are applied to WGs where QC procedures are not followed. The ship team could pilot the proposals made at the joint meeting with QC that recommended some improvements proposed by the ship team. Lists and templates developed by Frank Stolte could then be used in a document.
Master checklist is available online in SOLIS. ATS tutorial by QC latest revision and guideline for the ATS development (still have to be approved by the SC4)-
AP215 mapping and CD document review will follow the same directives as of AP218Quality plan-trying to figure out how to distribute assignments, etc.
Timing: Revision to be made before the CD document can show some problems that will be fixed before sending to CD. Have somebody responsible for part of the AP review, i.e., divide in groups of responsibility for each review member. The table below shows the schedule and responsible persons/organisations for the Ship APs CD review
QC Plan Format
AP CD Review Schedule
