日本財団 図書館


ANNEX 1

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT
REGULATIONS AND CODE FOR THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT
OF SHIPS' BALLAST WATER AND SEDIMENTS TO MINIMIZE THE
TRANSFER OF HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND PATHOGENS
(in the form of an Annex to MARPOL 73/78)

Comments and proposed amendments submitted to MEPC 42 for consideration as set out in documents MEPC 42/8/2. MEPC 42/8/3. MEPC 42/8/4 and MEPC 42/8/9 have been reviewed by the Ballast Water Working Group. The results of this review, together with a compilation of the proposed amendments, are set out in this annex.

 

MEPC 43/4
ANNEX 1
Page 2

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND COMMENTS ON THE
DRAFT REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF
SHIPS' BALLAST WATER AND SEDIMENTS TO MINIMIZE THE
TRANSFER OF HARMFUL AQUATIC ORGANISMS AND PATHOGENS
(In the form of an Annex to MARPOL 73/78)



Key: Italics =       Text from IMO resolution
   Underline or strike= Swedish proposal
   comments in footnotes

General comments

United Kingdom

Many of the draft regulations are written in terms of‘Parties shall....’even though the action is essentially for the ship. In keeping with Article I of MARPOL, and general practice in MARPOL Annexes, it is suggested that the wording be simplified to‘Ships shall.... ’where applicable.

Brazil

Brazil invites the Ballast Water WG to consider the inclusion of the following suggestions in the draft:

・   Adopt the risk assessment concept for the ballast water exchange operation. Neither of all ships, in all voyages, need to exchange ballast water; the draft should be revised accordingly to ensure the inclusion of this concept. When the ship is going to a voyage between two ports in which the eco-systems are similar/ compatible, then, we understand that the ballast water exchange operation is unnecessary and it should not be required. We consider necessary to specify this in the ballast regulations.

・   The criteria for the adoption of the new Aunex, when appropriate, should be the same used for Annex ? of MARPOL (on air pollution prevention) that is: 1 2 months after 15 States totalling 50% GRT of the world merchant fleet ratify the Annex;


Brazil invites the Ballast Water WG to consider the following general goals that should be achieved before the adoption of the new Annex Part B:

・   The model for the Ship Ballast Water Management Plan needs to be drafted and proposed to IMO. This will be necessary to enable the evaluation of the whole operational and economic impact of a possible Annex ? of MARPOL to the shipping industry/activities.

・   The absence of sufficient data related to environment indigenous species in the majority of the States is a barrier that should be considered. This barrier needs to be removed in order to enable adequate conditions to the Port States perform the ship's ballast water inspections and to apply risk assessment methodology for ship ballast water consideration (or acceptance) in port areas (in a global basis).

H:/MEPC/43/4.WPD

MED/MN/HBu/jeh


 

 

前ページ   目次へ   次ページ

 






日本財団図書館は、日本財団が運営しています。

  • 日本財団 THE NIPPON FOUNDATION