日本財団 図書館


NAV 44/7/8

Hydrographic Offices, for which that Government assumes responsibility, RCDS should be accepted as a solution to the problem of ENC coverage and that a Performance Standard be approved.

4    The initial proposal to NAV 43 provided for a separate Performance Standard for RCDS but many of those attending the IHO Meeting on HGE matters held this meant that there was, of necessity, repetition of the ECDIS Performance Standard and that this could cause confusion. It was therefore proposed that a RCDS Performance Standard should form a part of the ECDIS Performance Standards where it would logically fit. This is submitted as Appendix A, including the required amendment to the ECDIS Performance Standards.

5    The views of the IHO Member States, on the proposal in Appendix A, are attached as Appendix C and are summarized in Appendix B.

6    A draft SN/Circular outlining the differences between RCDS and ECDIS, was developed at HGE 18 (document HGE 18/11 rev.1) and is attached as Appendix D.

7    An RNC Product Specification is being developed by the IHO. The current draft is at Appendix E for information.

8    The Draft Guidelines for ECS were considered by the IHO Meeting on HGE Matters and an opinion by the Australian Government Solicitors Office, in this connection, was tabled. As this opinion expressed concern over the legal liability that Member States of a group retained should they be party to the approval of technical requirements in the form of guidelines, the delegates were of the opinion that their respective Governments would have to be consulted on the matter. They felt, however, that if the Draft Guidelines were retitled as "Advice" and were in the form proposed (Appendix F) they could probably support the submission of such a document to IMO.

9    The views of HGE Members on documents at Appendices A and D have been sought and are summarized in Appendix G. Comments expressed have been taken into account in the concerned documents.

10   It should be noted that reflecting HGE views paragraph 10.5.7 of the draft RCDS Mode of Operation in Appendix A says, in its first sentence, that "RCDS should provide an alarm when the input from the positioning-fixing system is lost". Paragraph 10.5.7 of the ECDIS Performance Standards makes provision for an indication only in that case. If the proposal in Appendix A is approved, it would appear necessary to amend the ECDIS Performance Standards and the draft RCDS Mode of Operation as in Appendix H.

Action requested of the Sub-Committee

11   It is requsted that the following proposals be considered by NAV 44:

.1   The attached RCDS Mode of Operation, as Appendix 7 to the ECDIS Performance Standards, and the amendment to the ECDIS PS (Annex A), be approved.

.2   The attached Advice on ECS (Annex F) be approved as the basis for ECS production and distribution.

 

I:/NAV/44/7/8.WPD

 

 

 

前ページ   目次へ   次ページ

 






日本財団図書館は、日本財団が運営しています。

  • 日本財団 THE NIPPON FOUNDATION