日本財団 図書館


EFFECTS OF TOKYO BAY AQUALINE
 
The concrete opinions for effects of the Tokyo Bay Aqualine were as follows:
(1) Good access to Yokohama, Tokyo and Haneda Airport, has made shopping in Yokohama or Tokyo and foreign or domestic touring of these areas much easier. However, Kisarazu was not vitalized because the consuming public left Kisarazu for Yokohama or Tokyo.
(2) Local exchanges were progressing and the commuting range was larger everywhere in Chiba prefecture.
(3) An improvement in economical image was obtained by increasing the distribution of goods through Tokyo Bay Aqualine.
(4) Tourism in southern Chiba Prefecture was on the increase, but cars began to pass through Kisarazu without stopping.
(5) Automobiles from other districts have congested the roads of Kisarazu leading to the southern and eastern parts of Chiba prefecture, and the entire town has become a motorway.
(6) Natural habitats were destroyed, but residents of Kisarazu must preserve the remaining undamaged natural areas.
(7) Kisarazu will be vitalized by merging with surrounding cities, such as Sodegaura, Futtsu, and Kimitsu.
(8) Kisarazu harbor became a desolate place because due to disuse of the ferry between Kawasaki and Kisarazu. Therefore, Kisarazu harbor must be renewed as a sightseeing spot surrounded by fishing harbors, tidelands and sea-bathing places.
(9) Kisarazu is a traditional and historical town, and is well proportioned by three parts of the seasides, between the mountain and the farms, and so residents wish to maintain Kisarazu harbor in its present state.
(10) The construction of the Tokyo Bay Aqualine required a public investment of 130,000,000 yen. An appalling fact because no projects or enterprises will be developed to return the investment, not to mention the cost of construction and maintenance. An old proverb states, "The foot of a bridge will not be prosperous". The Tokyo Bay Aqualine has been used by sightseeing buses and private cars for traveling to fish, play golf, etc., whereas trucks rarely use the bridge. Several shoppers travel to Kawasaki, Yokohama and Tokyo via highway buses because large shopping centers have become rare in Kisarazu. Therefore, more money is flowing out of Kisarazu than is flowing into Kisarazu. Residents and visitors are passing by the area at the foot of bridge without stopping. The development of Kisarazu and the surrounding area requires a combined development plan for Futtsu, Kimitsu and Sodegaura early on, and a highly skilled administrative executive.
 
CONCLUSIONS
 
There are three routes by which to access the southern region of Chiba prefecture from Tokyo and Yokohama. These include the Keiyou route from the Capital Highway 7, the Higashikantou Highway along Tokyo Bay, and the Tokyo Bay Aqualine from Kawasaki. The tolls for the Keihin route and Higashikantou Highway are cheaper than Tokyo Bay Aqualine, but the Tokyo Bay Aqualine route is shorter. In the future, another bay bridge connecting Kannonnzaki of Kanagawa prefecture to Futtsu of Chiba prefecture at the entrance in Tokyo Bay is being planned. In Japan, bridges and tunnels across bays or channels are necessary for the well-being of cities and towns on both sides of the bay. The results of questionnaires in this study will be helpful for the construction of future bay bridges. The conclusions of the present study are as follows:
(1) Several respondents answered that Kisarazu was within easy access of metropolitan Tokyo. Yokohama and Haneda International Airport.
(2) A number of respondents reported a lack of entertainment in and around Kisarazu Station and Kisarazu Harbor, although no major changes were made to Kisarazu after beginning service Tokyo Bay Aqualine.
(3) Several respondents stated that Kisarazu should be revitalized by attracting tourism, and vitalizing commerce and fishery.
(4) Several respondents expected that Kisarazu will be developed with preserved nature and will have many opportunity of doing business in fishery.
(5) In order to economically strengthen Kisarazu, the fundamental tourist attractions, such as marine life, seafood restaurants and fishing resources as well as shell gathering at low tide around Kisarazu Harbor and Banzu Tideland must be boosted.
 
REFERENCES 7
 
Asahi newspaper. 2002. The Living Standard in 2002.
 
Heibonsha. 1967. The World Encyclopedia.
 
Japan Harbor Association. 2002. Pocket Book of Harbor.
 
STATISTICS BUREAU. 2002. STATISTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF SHI, KU, MACHI, MURA
 
Teikoku Shoin. 2000. Complete Atlas of Japan.
 
Table 1. Comparison between Kisarazu and Kawasaki (STATISTICAL BUREAU, 2002)
  Population >15 years old 15-64 years old 65 years old <
Kisarazu 122,768 17,558 86,191 19,018
Kawasaki 1,249,905 170,670 923,655 154,704
 
  Daytime Population Number of Households Move in Population Move out Population
Kisarazu 119,995 43,251 5,489 6,514
Kawasaki 1,097,090 543,088 98,342 106,265
 
  Total Area Inhabited Area Taxable Income No. of Taxpay
Kisarazu 138.65(km2) 92.14(km2) \189,068(million) 49,455
Kawasaki 142.70 134.78 \2,459,855 572,562
 
  Places of Business Workers Agricultural Production Cost Shipment of Production
Kisarazu 5,714 52,415 \6,930(million) \274,449(million)
Kawasaki 46,789 536,614 \3,400 \4,346,334
 
  Sale Price of Commerce Number of Store Value of Land (Residence) Value of Land (Commerce)
Kisarazu \314,938(million) 1,531 \58,600/m2 \139,800/m2
Kawasaki \2,784,145 3,168 \2,874,000 \617,500
 
  Primary Industry Workers Secondary Industry Workers Tertiary Industry Workers  
Kisarazu 3,320 16,718 41,029  
Kawasaki 2,964 177,773 457,387  
 
  Road Extension Number of Park Number of Hospital Number of Old Age Home
Kisarazu 868.3(km) 109 11 5
Kawasaki 2455.3 810 39 22







日本財団図書館は、日本財団が運営しています。

  • 日本財団 THE NIPPON FOUNDATION