|
ANNEX 20
PSSA PROPOSAL REVIEW FORM
The Technical Group will ask that the proposing Member Government provide a response to the issues raised below, including the appropriate citations to its submission. This, in combination with comments and information offered by other Member Governments regarding the proposed PSSA, will enable a thorough discussion and assessment of the proposal by the Technical Group.1
1 General
| （拡大画面：12KB） |
 |
|
|
|
2 Summary of the Proposal and Other Necessary Background Information
2.1 What are the objectives of the proposed designation? (paragraph 7.4)2
2.2 Is the description of the area complete and is it, and the existing or proposed associated protective measure (APM), clearly depicted on a chart or chartlet? (paragraph 7.5.1.1)
2.3 Does the application provide an adequate summary of the need for protection, including a demonstration of the identified vulnerability to international shipping? (paragraph 7.4)
2.4 Is the APM adequately described, including how it will address the identified vulnerability? (paragraph 7.4)
2.5 Are the reasons included as to why the APM is the preferred method for providing protection? (paragraph 7.4)
2.6 Are there other Member States that have a common interest in the proposed area? (paragraph 3.1)
2.7 If the answer to 2.6 is yes, have they been consulted to formulate a coordinated proposal, with integrated measures and procedures for cooperation? (paragraph 3.1)
|
1 As with the PSSA Guidelines, references to "Member Government" and "measure" are in the singular and it is intended that such usage encompasses both the singular and plural of these terms.
2 The paragraphs are citations to the appropriate paragraphs in the Revised PSSA Guidelines.
|
3 Ecological, Socio-economic, or Scientific Criteria (Guidelines Section 4)
Do the supporting documentation and references establish that the area is vulnerable to damage or the identified threat of damage from international shipping activities for at least one of the following reasons? (paragraph 4.1)
(In addressing this point, at least one of the criteria needs to exist throughout the entire proposed area, though the same criterion need not be present throughout the entire area.) (paragraph 4.4)
Ecological criteria (beginning at paragraph 4.4.1)
3.1 Uniqueness or rarity: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.2 Critical habitat: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.3 Dependency: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.4 Representativeness: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.5 Diversity: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.6 Productivity: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.7 Spawning or breeding grounds: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.8 Naturalness: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.9 Integrity: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.10 Fragility: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.11 Bio-geographic importance: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
Social, cultural, and economic criteria (beginning at paragraph 4.4.12)
3.12 Social or economic dependency: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.13 Human dependency: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.14 Cultural heritage: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
Scientific and educational criteria (beginning at paragraph 4.4.15)
3.15 Research: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.16 Baseline for monitoring studies: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
3.17 Education: Is the proposal based on this criterion? If so, is the criterion met, why, and based on what information?
Conclusion: Does the proposed area fulfil at least one of the above criteria in section 3 throughout the entire proposed area? If so, which criterion, why, and based on what information? The Technical Group should provide a brief summary of this element in its report to the Committee.
|
