ISO/TC8 INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL for MARITIME SECURITY INITIATIVES
・CAPT. Orlando Allard, Ambassador to IMO from Panama
・Mike Toddington, Executive Director, International Assn. Airport / Seaport Police
・Cleopatra Doumbia-Henry,Deputy Director, International Labour Organisation
・Jouko Lempiainen, Director Compliance & Facilitation, World Customs Organisation
・P.C.van der Kluit, IAPH Europe Office
・Chris Horrocks, Secretary General, International Chamber of Shipping
・Miguel Palomares, International Maritime Organisation
・John Saunders, International Chamber of Commerce
・CAPT. Ted Thompson, Executive VP, International Council of Cruise Lines
・Henry F. White, President, Institute of International Container Lessors
・Trevor Dixon, World Nuclear Transport Institute
・Dagmar Thomas, UN Office on Drugs and Crime
・Tom Butterly, UN Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE)
・Jose Rubiato, UN Conference on Trade & Development (UNCTAD)
・Jean Rey, Secretary General, Bureau International des Containers et du Transport Intermodal (BIC)
・Diego Teurelincx, European Union Commission
・Joe Angelo, USCG - Chair ISO TC8/SC2, US Delegate to IMO
・Port (Terminal Operations)Directors - Singapore, Panama, Rotterdam,・・・.et al
・CAPT. N. Robin Lee, Director, Maritime Authority of Jamaica
・Dr. Stephen Flynn, Senior Fellow, Council on Foreign Relations
・RADM Carl J. Seiberlich, Project Director, "ISO International Pilot Program"
SUMMARY
・International Linkages already well established - ISO Secretary General Assigned Responsibility to ISO/TC8 as follows:
・Principal Liaison to IMO - we attend all IMO Committee and most SC meetings - for past 7 years, active member of Maritime Security WG
・ISO/TC8 Chair is designated ISO Rep to IAPH - for past 15 years
・ISO/TC8 Chair is ISO Rep to ILO for Maritime
・ISO/TC8 is Principal Maritime Security Liaison to WCO
SUMMARY (Cont)
・ISO/TC8 has ongoing active collaboration with International Organizations in Shipping & Shipbuilding-
・ISO/TC8 is active participant in UN/ECE Committee on Water Transport
・ISO/TC8 actively working with EU leaders on "Intermodal and short sea shipping" to provide international standards for use by the EU - Vienna agreement establishes agreement between ISO and EU on standards development
SUMMARY (Cont.)
・The initiatives undertaken by ISO/TC8 in maritime security presented to the IMO are "inclusive", not "exclusive". There are many fields of expertise in ISO among our various committees. We will draw upon any and all to participate to achieve our objective of "increased maritime security" while "preserving viability and productivity of trade".
・The Maritime Industry is "International" - Regional or National solutions are not best interest of the industry.
ADDITIONAL REFERENCE SLIDES
TC8/TC67 STRATEGIC ALLIANCE
・MoU SIGNED BY TC CHAIRS - 2000-09-11
- DOES NOT MODIFY COMMITTEE SCOPES - FIRST SUCH AGREEMENT IN ISO HISTORY
・INSURES COOPERATION & PARTICPATION IN DRILLING & PRODUCTION FLOATING SYSTEMS
- Hulls Basically TC8
- Systems & Requirements TC67
- FPSOs, FSUs, OSVs, ATBs
・TC8 CONTINUES AS PRINCIPAL INTERFACE WITH IMO
ISO TC8/TC104 STRATEGIC ALLIANCE
・ MoU SIGNED BY THE TC CHAIRMEN
- TC8 (Ships & Marine Technology)
- TC104 (Freight Containers)
・Insures Active Cooperation & Participation with Each Other in Writing Standards to Insure a Seamless, "Intermodal" (Ships and Ship/Port Interface) Movement of Freight in Freight Containers
・ISO/TC8 Continues to Provide Principal ISO Interface with IMO
・Agreement Dated 2002-06-20
ISO TC8/SCST STRATEGIC ALLIANCE
・MoU SIGNED by ISO Secretary General; Chairman, ISO/TC8 and Chairman, Strategic Council on Security Technology (SCST)
・Forges a strategic partnership to secure the future of the global supply chain (excluding aviation) and develop associated international standards for intermodal supply chain security
・Agreement Dated 2003-03-31
Maritime Security
Maritime security is dependent on the international exchange of information concerning ships, cargo, and people.
The primary limitation of information exchange is not computer or communications technology but lack of a common understanding about the meaning of the data.
|