17 FUTURE ROLE OF FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND HUMAN ELEMENT
17.1 The Committee recalled that MEPC 48, due to lack of time, agreed that the discussion under this item would be deferred to the present session.
17.2 The Committee recalled that the Joint MSC/MEPC Working Group on the human element met during MSC 75 in May 2002. MSC 75 considered the report of the Joint Working Group as set out in attachment to document MEPC 48/16 and took action with regard to the Human Element as set out in paragraphs 15.6 to 15.16 of document MSC 75/24 and with regard to Formal Safety Assessment as set out in document MEPC 48/16/1.
17.3 The Committee, noting that several of the actions requested have been overtaken by event, considered the report of the Joint Working Group as attached to document MEPC 48/16 and:
.1 agreed with the MSC to instruct all Sub-Committees to continue to take into consideration appropriate human element related matters in the course of their work;
.2 noted the preliminary draft revised Assembly resolution A.792(19) for consideration and finalisation at MSC 77;
.3 agreed with the MSC to instruct the Sub-Committees to report their experience in the application of the guidance given MSC/Circ.1022-MEPC/Circ.391;
.4 noted the preliminary list of tools developed and activities carried out by the Organization directly addressing the human element;
.5 endorsed the decision by MSC 75 to reconvene the working group at MSC 77; and
.6 approved the report in general.
17.4 The Committee noted that the joint Working Group did not meet during MSC 76. However, the Role of the Human Element was on the agenda of MSC 76. The outcome of the MSC 76 consideration is reported in document MSC 76/23, Chapter 15. No action in this regard is requested of the Committee.
17.5 The Committee noted that MSC 77 considered the role of the Human Element and Formal Safety Assessment, which were reported under agenda item 17, paragraphs 17.1 to 17.8 of document MSC 77/26. Formal Safety Assessment was considered by MSC 77 under agenda item 18 (paragraphs 18.1 to 18.11 of document MSC 77/26 refer).
17.6 The Committee, noting the concurrent decision by MSC 77, approved the revised text of resolution A.850(20) relating to human element vision, principles and goals for the Organization as set out in annex 20 of MSC 77/26.
17.7 The Committee considered the submission by United Kingdom (MEPC 49/17) by which it is proposed to use the principles of the IMO's Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) methodology in connection with reviewing and taking necessary action on casualty information.
17.8 In this regard, the Committee noted that MSC 77 decided to establish a correspondence group under the co-ordination of Japan* and agreed with the term of reference for the group (MSC 77/26, paragraph 18.8).
17.9 After an exchange of views, the Committee decided to add the following item to the terms of reference for the correspondence group:
".4 to consider the need to develop a risk index relevant to the protection of the marine environment".
17.10 The Committee invited delegates to the Committee to actively participate in the work of the correspondence group.
18 APPLICATION OF THE COMMITTEE'S GUIDELINES
Outcome of the Chairmen's Meeting on Review of the Sub-Committee Structure
18.1 The Committee recalled that MSC 76 considered the application of the Committee's Guidelines and noted that the various proposals on new concepts to improve the performance of the sub-committees were brought to the meeting of the Chairmen of the MSC, MEPC, TCC and the FAL Committee along with the Chairmen of the technical sub-committees, which was held on 15 June 2002.
18.2 The Committee also recalled that it had deferred consideration of the outcome of the Chairmen's Meeting (MEPC 48/18/2) to this session, having no time to consider it at MEPC 48.
18.3 In addition to amendments to the Committees' Guidelines, the Committee noted the decisions of MSC 76 as reflected in MEPC 49/18 covering the following points:
.1 recommendations to amend Committees' Guidelines;
.2 long-term work plan of the Organization and determination of whether there is a need to restructure the sub-committees;
.3 ability to implement new requirements and recommendations;
.4 responsibilities and roles of the sub-committee Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen;
.5 attendance of journalists at meetings of IMO's technical bodies; and
.6 other matters discussed by the Chairmen's Meeting.
18.4 The Committee generally concurred with the decisions of MSC 76 and agreed, in particular:
.1 to amend the Committees' Guidelines to reflect the recommendations of the Chairmen's Meeting;
.2 to approve the revised text of the Committee's Guidelines as set out in MEPC 49/18/1;
.3 to instruct the sub-committees to consider the terms of reference and prepare updated terms of reference for consideration by MSC 78 and MEPC 51;
.4 that any modifications to the long-term work plan deemed necessary to achieve the objectives of the Organization, as set out in resolution A.900(21), would be conditional on any change in the structure of the sub-committees, which, in turn, should only be considered when the outcome of the Ad Hoc Council Working Group on the Organization's Strategic Plan becomes available and the strategy and policy of the Organization are agreed;
.5 that there was no need, at present, to change the structure of the sub-committees;
.6 that Guidelines on the roles and responsibilities of sub-committee Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen should be prepared for consideration at the next Chairmen's Meeting and that the Secretariat shall be requested to attempt drafting such Guidelines, with a view to submission to the next Chairmen's Meeting;
.7 that, in the case of requests from journalists to be present at particular sessions of a committee/sub-committee, these should be assessed on a case-by-case basis and that the body concerned should decide at the beginning of the session whether, and under which conditions, this should be allowed, taking into account that, under the Committees' Rules of Procedure, meetings are normally held in private unless otherwise determined. In this context, the Committee agreed to provide comments to the draft guidelines MEPC 49/11/9, annex) to the Council as discussed under agenda item 11 and reflected in paragraph 11.5.1.4; and
.8 endorsed the opinion of the Chairmen's Meeting that, by strictly observing the Guidelines, even as they stand at present, the work of the Organization's technical bodies will gain not only in quality of output but also in efficiency and effectiveness.
Rearranged text of the Guidelines on the organization and method of work of the MSC and MEPC and their subsidiary bodies
18.5 The Committee noted that MSC 77 reviewed the draft rearranged and modified text of the Guidelines, which was prepared to reflect various amendments already considered by previous sessions of the Committees as well as recommendations from the Chairmen's Meeting.
18.6 The Committee noted that the amendments to paragraph 2.27 of the rearranged Guidelines by the delegation of Japan, to which MSC 77 agreed, were to remove the square bracket and add the following sentence (MSC 77/26, paragraph 22.2):
"However, in exceptional circumstances where the draft amendments under consideration include significant discrepancies or omissions, or where serious difficulties in their application can be foreseen, the Committees may accept to discuss oral proposals aiming at resolving any problems identified."
18.7 The Committee noted the comments of the delegation of Japan to consider other discussion points cited in MEPC 49/18 to be included in future revisions of the Guidelines.
18.8 In this regard, the Committee recalled that the Guidelines are kept under continuous review by both the MSC and MEPC.
18.9 Having considered the outcome of MSC 77 on the rearranged Guidelines in MEPC 49/18/1, the Committee concurred with the outcome of MSC 77 and instructed the Secretariat to issue the revised Guidelines as MSC/Circ.1099-MEPC/Circ.405, superseding MSC/Circ.931-MEPC/Circ.366.
19 WORK PROGRAMME OF THE COMMITTEE AND SUBSIDIARY BODIES
Work programmes and provisional agendas of the BLG and FSI Sub-Committees
19.1 Having noted the information provided in MEPC 49/19 on the work programmes and provisional agendas of the BLG and FSI Sub-Committees, and after considering the recommendation of MSC 77 to combine BLG 9 with DSC 8 in 2004 in light of the outcome of discussion under agenda item 11 (MEPC 49/11/6, paragraph 14.2), the Committee:
.1 decided not to convene BLG 9 in 2004;
.2 approved the proposed work programmes and provisional agendas of the BLG and FSI Sub-Committees, which are set out in annex 23; and
.3 in approving the work programme of the BLG Sub-Committee, the Committee recommended to postpone the target completion date for H.4 and H.5 to 2005, subject to approval by the MSC, taking into account that BLG 9 will not meet in 2004.
Work programmes of the DSC, NAV, DE, SLF and STW Sub-Committees, which relate to environmental issues
19.2 The Committee, noting the information provided in MEPC 49/19/1 and the decision of MSC 77, which revised and approved the work programmes of the DSC, NAV, DE, SLF and STW Sub-Committees (MSC 77/26, annex 22), approved the environmental related items in the work programmes of the DSC, NAV, DE, SLF and STW Sub-Committees, which are set out at annex 24.
Restructuring of the sub-committees
19.3 The Committee noted that MSC 76, having considered the Chairmen's Meeting recommendations, instructed the sub-committees to consider the matter under the agenda item on "Work programme" and to prepare updated terms of reference for consideration by MSC 78 and MEPC 51 (MEPC 49/18, paragraph 5).
19.4 The Committee also noted that MSC 76, having considered the long-term work plan of the Organization, saw no immediate need to change the structure of the sub-committees at present (MEPC 49/18, paragraph 6).
19.5 The Committee concurred with MSC 76 on the outcome of the Chairmen's Meeting and requested the sub-committees to prepare updated terms of reference for consideration by MEPC 51 and MSC 78.
The Committee's current work programme and long-term plan (up to 2010)
19.6 The Committee recalled that its current work programme and the proposed long-term work plan (up to 2010) were considered at MEPC 48 (MEPC 48/18/3) to be included in the long-term work plan of the Organization (MEPC 48/21, paragraph 18.15).
19.7 The Committee was informed that the ninetieth session of the Council took note of the Committee's long-term plan (C 90/21, annex).
19.8 The Committee instructed the Secretariat to submit its long-term work plan up to 2010 (MEPC 48/18/3), as noted by the Council, to the twenty-third session of the Assembly.
Progress report on the Committee's work since the last Assembly
19.9 The Committee considered and approved the progress report on the Committee's long-term work plan (up to 2008) as contained in resolution A.907(22) (MEPC 49/WP.1) and requested the Secretariat to update the progress report concerning the work of MEPC 49 before submission to the twenty-third session of the Assembly.
Substantive items to be included in the Committee's agenda for its forthcoming three regular sessions
19.10 The Committee considered and approved the substantive items to be included in the agendas for MEPC 51, MEPC 52 and MEPC 53 (MEPC 49/WP.4) as amended, which are set out at annex 25.
Working/Drafting groups at MEPC 51
19.11 The Committee agreed, in principle, to establish the following working/drafting groups at MEPC 51:
.1 working group on ballast water management;
.2 working group on ship recycling;
.3 working group on air pollution related issues; and
.4 drafting group on amendments to MARPOL 73/78.
Correspondence groups
19.12 The Committee agreed to establish an intersessional correspondence group on the development of an IMO GHG emission indexing scheme.
Intersessional meeting
19.13 The Committee agreed to hold an additional meeting of the intersessional ESPH Working Group, subject to concurrent decision of the MSC and approval by the Council.
Dates for the extra session (MEPC 50)
19.14 The Committee decided to hold the extra session as MEPC 50 on 1 and 4 December 2003 to consider and adopt amendments to MARPOL Annex I proposed in the wake of Prestige.
Dates for MEPC 51 and MEPC 52
19.15 The Committee noted that MEPC 51 would be held from 29 March to 2 April 2004 and that MEPC 52 is tentatively scheduled in October 2004.
* Co-ordinator:
Mr. Koichi Yoshida
Vice-Principal Research Co-ordinator
National Maritime Research Institute
6-38-1 Shinkawa
Mitaka 181-0004
Japan
Tel: +81 422 41 3615
Fax: +81 422 41 3247
e-mail: koichiy@nmri.go.jp
|