日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

海洋文化・文明に関する調査報告書(英文)

 事業名 基盤整備
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


By the second half of the sixteenth century, Japan had become the world_s biggest producer and user of firearms, and by the end of the Sengoku period (1467_1568) it had become a greater military power than any European country, possessing military techniques that were at least the equal of those of Europe. Yet the attitudes of Europe and Japan to firearms came to be almost diametrically opposed as Europe forged ahead with the use, improvement and enlargement of guns, while Japan moved in the direction of restriction and reduction of armaments. By 1800 Japan was no longer a military power. Japan_s national policy during the Meiji era (1868_1912) was encapsulated in the slogan fukoku ky_ei (_enrich the country and strengthen the military_), and of course firearms were the material basis for strengthening the military.

Both China and Japan could have become military powers in the early modern era if they had so inclined, but both pursued a path of disarmament that can only be described as the abandonment of the gun. Why did they choose this path?

 

The Dramatic Change of Course from Expansion to Reduction of Armaments

The first encounter of the Japanese with guns was their first encounter with Europeans. According to most textbooks, guns were first brought to Japan in 1543 by Portuguese whose ship was washed ashore on the island of Tanegashima. However, there is some room for doubt about this version of events and in the academic world a fierce debate continues. The primary source in Japan concerning the introduction of firearms is Tepp_i (History of firearms) written by the Buddhist priest Nanpo Bunshi of Satsuma Province (now Kagoshima Prefecture). Since Tepp_i states that _more than 60 years have passed since the introduction of firearms,_ its contents have naturally been subjected to considerable debate. Tepp_ denrai to sono eiky_(Firearms: their introduction and influence, Shibunkaku, 1974) by Hora Tomio provides a balanced and comprehensive account of the many points of contention.

The account of the introduction of firearms given in Tepp_i is basically as follows. On August 25, 1543, a large foreign ship of uncertain provenance arrived in the bay of Nishimura on Tanegashima island. One of the crew was a man called Goh_ with whom the Japanese could communicate in writing. The crew included foreign merchants, one of whom was named Murashukusha and another Kirishitadamota (Christopher or Antonio da Mota). They had with them fearsome objects called guns, which the Lord Tokitaka, the feudal master of Tanegashima, purchased for a high price without complaint.

Tokitaka ordered his retainers to learn from the foreigners how to prepare gunpowder and had them replicate the gun barrel. But the breech of the gun was fastened with a bolt with a screw attached, and the Japanese at that time did not know how to make screws. A man named Yaita (Yatsuita??) Kinbei learned this screw-making technique from foreigners who came the following year, and the Japanese at last succeeded in making a prototype gun. Thus, nearly one year after the introduction of firearms, the Japanese were able to manufacture firearms in large numbers. Soon afterwards, Suginob_ a priest from Negoro Temple in Kii Province (now Wakayama Prefecture) came to Tanegashima seeking firearms. Tokitaka gave him one gun and taught him how to use it. Tachibanaya Matasabur_ a merchant from Sakai, later stayed on Tanegashima for one or two years to learn how to make firearms and was nicknamed _Gun Mata_ upon his return. The use of firearms subsequently spread not only to the Capital Provinces (the five provinces surrounding the ancient capitals of Kyoto and Nara) and Kansai in west Japan but also to Kanto in the east. The explanation concludes by praising Tokitaka_s achievement: _Tokitaka acquired firearms from the European visitors, learned about them, and spread this knowledge throughout the five home provinces and seven circuits._

It is also known that the ship washed ashore on the coast of Tanegashima island was a junk captained by _hoku, and that the name Goh_ mentioned in the account in Tepp_i was the pen name of this _hoku, who came from Anhui province in China and was the chief of a band of Japanese pirates based in the Got_islands in Hizen Province.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,508位
(32,645成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
6,188

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年10月24日

関連する他の成果物

1.「SYLFF WORKING PAPERS NO.15」ビデオ (http://www.princeton.edu/duke)
2.東京財団1999年度年次報告書(和文)
3.東京財団1999年年次報告書(英文)
4.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第1回オープニングセッション?
5.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第2回世界の人々のアイデンティティ作りに役立つマンガ・アニメ?
6.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第3回マンガ・アニメ産業の存立基盤はSOHOにあり?
7.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第4回日本製マンガ・アニメが高い価値で世界市場で流通し日本にとっての収益源となるために、いま何が必要か?
8.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第5回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイスは地方からスタートする?
9.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第6回日本製マンガ・アニメが更に発展するには何が必要か?
10.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第7回文化のローカライゼーション?
11.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第8回マンガ・アニメで県づくり。新パラダイムは地方からスタートする?
12.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第9回キャラクタービジネスのパースペクティブ?
13.日本発マンガ・アニメーションのダイナミズム ?第11回ポップカルチャーが作る新しい勢力図?
14.世界都市東京フォーラム「技術からの考案」会議録
15.世界都市東京フォーラム「歴史と文化からの考案」会議録
16.「日米韓安全保障協力:平時と有事の想定」
17.「米中両国にとっての朝鮮半島?日本の対朝鮮半島政策への含意」
18.Japan’s New Middle Eastern Policy
19.Policy Analysis Review
20.英文冊子 Intellectual Cabinet 2000
21.「国会におけるODA基本法の論議と地方自治体による援助の重要性」
22.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.18 「日本の外交安全保障戦略を考える」
23.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.19 「NPO法施行後の現状と課題」
24.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.23 「ビジネスモデルを通じた産業のダイナミズム」
25.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.26 「国民参加型外交の可能性と課題」
26.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.27 「これからの朝鮮半島の行方」
27.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.28 「マスコミによる経済事象の選択と報道」
28.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.29 「陳水扁新政権下の台湾政治」
29.Issues Series/論点シリーズ vol.30 「朝鮮半島の将来に日本が貢献できること」
30.「政策シリーズ」第18号「霞ヶ関1府12省体制は行革の決定通り進んでいるか?」
31.「政策シリーズ」第20号「金融監督政策の方向性について」
32.「政策シリーズ」第21号「COP6に向けた我が国の取り組み」
33.平成11年度里親研修会テキスト
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から