Appropriate observations of conformance and non-conformance should be recorded for later use in developing an audit report.
At the closing meeting the results of the audit, including the non-conformities identified, the remedial action to be taken and the recommendation regarding accreditation, should be reviewed with reprdesentatives of The Organisation..
3.3 Reporting
The results of Phase 2 assessment activities should be documented in a report.
The report should:
・Summarise the results oft he phase 2 assessment;
・Include identified non-conformities;
・Indicate requirements for timely corrective action and any follow-up activities;
・Indicate the recommendation for accreditation;
Where practicable, the audit report should be prepared for presentation at the closing meeting.
4 Phase 3
4.1 Assessment for issuance of Accreditation certificate.
Phase 3 consists of:
・Audit follow-up activities
・Issuance of accreditation
The Training Institute is responsible for correcting any deficiencies identified during the audit. The Training Institute should report proposed corrective actions to the auditor for review and acceptance. The auditor should review the proposed corrective actions submitted by the Training Institute and determine their acceptability. If the proposed corrective actions are acceptable, the auditor should indicate this by documented correspondence with the Training Institute. Depending on the nature of the non-conformities the auditor may require a follow-up audit to confirm effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions.
Upon satisfactory closure of audit activities accreditation should be issued to the Training Institute for a period of five years subject to periodic assessments of the TMS.
4.2 Periodic audit.
Phase 3 consists of:
・Audit follow-up activities
・Endorsement of the Accreditation certificate
The Training Institute is responsible for correcting any deficiencies identified during the periodic audit. The Training Institute should report proposed corrective actions to the auditor for review and acceptance. The auditor should review the proposed corrective actions submitted by the Training Institute and determine their acceptability. If the proposed corrective actions are acceptable, the auditor should indicate this by documented correspondence with the Training Institute. Depending on the nature of the non-conformities the auditor may require a follow-up audit to confirm effectiveness of the implemented corrective actions or, in the case of major non-conformities, recommend that the Accreditation certificate be suspended until corrective action has been successfully undertaken.
Upon satisfactory closure of periodic audit activities an endorsement should be made on the Accreditation certificate.
