日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 教育 > 成果物情報

The Suffocation Of HongKong

 事業名 国際的人材育成と研究活動推進のための基金の増額(Further endowment of fund for following-up
 団体名 東京財団政策研究所 注目度注目度5


"Yet, what happened? There was a fifth of the population out on the streets. I have never been anywhere in the world where this has happened for any reason. As well, it was in such a controlled, orderly manner where there was absolutely no need for policing during those momentous days."

 

Vines' book Hong Kong: China's New Colony pulls no punches, Hong Kong Foreign Correspondents' Club President Diane Stormont said in a review of his book, "The title lays out the central thesis which is cogently argued throughout the book. I have no problem with his view. Like Steve, I believe that it was China's intention all along to inherit a docile colony and continue to run Hong Kong as such. Indeed Hong Kong was a docile colony when the Joint Declaration was signed in 1984. Ideally, Beijing would have liked to freeze-dry the place and its people for the next 13 years. Hence all the dismay over any plan to introduce more representative government even before the Tiananmen massacre overturned so many cozy assumptions and sent the future leaders back to the drawing board to draft herder-nosed plans for assuming the reins of power."

The receiver said the nub of the argument is contained in Chapter Seven, titled "The Shameless Elite". The chapter heading sums it up rather neatly:

"When it comes to colonies, probably the most important lever of power for the rulers lies in picking and shaping the comprador class - members of the elite section of the community who serve at the conduit between rulers and the ruled. The British were masters at this. And as Steve details, Beijing has shown itself to be just as adroit."

Not that it had much persuading to do in terms of winning hearts and minds. "The most assiduously pro-British members of the old establishment were the most active in making their obeisance to the new masters," he wrote.

He calls them Rice Communists and spares no blushes, singling out individuals by name. He weighs up Hong Kong's elite and finds them wanting. "The members of the elite, who are genuinely prepared to stand up for the interests of the Hong Kong people can be counted on the fingers of a single hand," he states. Later on, returning to theme, he muses: "The average person expects little from the elite and is rarely disappointed."

Reviewer Stormont said. "The first person style of the book makes for a comfortable read. It also enables him to paint a picture of living in Hong Kong through anecdotes.

"There is already a more Chinese feel to Hong Kong," she quotes Vines although he goes on to admit this is hard to pin down. He gives a glimpse of a brush with triads and a very tiny glimpse into his time as Editor of the Eastern Express which ended in acrimony." (2)

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,812位
(32,450成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
4,722

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2020年8月1日

関連する他の成果物

1.Glossary of Japanese Transport Policy(運輸用語辞典)
2.海と日本 ビデオ第3作「海賊一村上一族盛哀記一」
3.海と日本 ビデオ第4作「北前船奔る」
4.海と日本 ビデオ第5作「琉球の時代」
5.海と日本 ビデオ第6作「マラッカ海峡?世界が出会う海の交差点?」
6.GFRS政策シリーズ第12号「自由党の政策構想と自自連立?鈴木淑夫?」
7.GFRS政策シリーズ第13号「6月の総選挙に向かって?インドネシアの現状と展望?白石隆」
8.GFRS政策シリーズ第14号「東アジア危機とIMF?白井早由里?」
9.GFRS政策シリーズ第15号「銀行セクターの近況と未来?小原由起子?」
10.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.11 「共和党多数議会とクリントン政権の行方、そして日米関係の将来像を模索する ?デビット・ファンダーバーク氏?」
11.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.12 「国を超えたシビル・ソサエティ?オタワ・プロセス、そして今後? ?目加田説子?」
12.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.13 「ノン・プロフィット:アメリカの教育に果たす役割から ?上野真城子?」
13.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.14 「混迷するロシア政局と今後の日ロ関係?岸田芳樹? ?上野真城子?」
14.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.15 「中央省庁等革命問題 ?田中 一昭?」
15.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.16 「日本は何を目指しているのか:日本の安全保障を考える?長島昭久?」
16.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.17 「戦火の果て コソボ紛争 現場から?外岡秀俊?」
17.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.22 「東ティモール問題?その過去と未来、そして世界と日本?貴島正道?」
18.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.24 「パキスタン・クーデター’99?政治的・経済的視点からの分析?小田尚也?」
19.GFRS ISSUES SERIES No.25 「新しい文化=芸術を創造するために?市村作知雄?」
20.作品別(月別)実施回数一覧表
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から