日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 産業 > 運輸.交通 > 成果物情報

The Northern Sea Route The Shortest sea route linking East Asia and Europe

 事業名 基盤整備
 団体名 シップ・アンド・オーシャン財団  


Historical rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union

The United States has been consistently opposed to Russia's legal stance on the NSR and has refused to ratify UNCLOS. In terms of the impact of Arctic issues on relations between the two countries, the NSR is one of the biggest bones of contention. Both sides are adamant in their positions, which are diametrically opposed. Russia has declared the waters of the straits between its shores to be internal waters, whereas the United States asserts its right of passage through what it regards as straits in international waters. Each country defends its position in terms of national security interests. In its defense Russia can marshal a number of arguments. The Vilkitskiy, Shokalskiy, Dmitry Laptev, Sannikov, Eteriken, Yugorskiy Shar, Kara Gate and Red Army Straits are all less than 12NM wide, arguing strongly for their status as territorial waters. Moreover, historically little maritime traffic other than Russia's own has ever passed through the NSR. In cases where straits abut the territorial waters of another country, or provide the only means of maritime entrance to the waters of another country, some straits have been designated international waters, but neither of these conditions applies to the straits in the NSR. The United States' grounds for supporting its assertion of right of passage is weak, and most third parties appear to support the Russian position. As stated above, the United States also opposes CASPPR, Canada's Arctic environmental regulations. This stance is consistent with the American refusal to ratify UNCLOS.

 

4.3.7 Conclusion

In the foregoing discussion of procedures required for navigation of the NSR and the legal background to those requirements, we have found much that is inconvenient and unsatisfactory to civilians and companies intending to ply these waters. The demand for four months' advance notice of NSR navigation is hard to coordinate with the contracts of tramp operations, which are often chartered for much shorter periods of time. Both recent and current data on ice conditions, which are crucial in proposing routes and estimating travel times, are not made available free of charge. Persons who must have data and forecasts on ice conditions vital for navigation can only obtain them by paying a fee to AARI or other governmental organizations. When the time and effort of concluding contracts and so forth is considered, NSR shipping remains a distant prospect for today's shipping market, which requires fast decision-making. On a cost-benefit basis, NSR shipping is at present hard to justify. As is described in Section 4.4, transit fees, or tariff structures for the NSR are by no means acceptable in comparison to the route via the Suez Canal, and even after the fee is paid there is no guarantee that the NSR will provide speedy and fully safe passage. It is our hope that Russia will begin to provide clear guarantee of the services it provides in exchange for its transit fees. At present, the opening of the NSR is only at the phase of laying the appropriate legal groundwork, since physical preparations are so poor. The advanced state of dilapidation of the NSR infrastructure put into place over many years is now becoming apparent. If this infrastructure crumbles completely, it will have to be rebuilt at great expense. Revamping the navigational and legal system of the NSR to provide acceptable convenience to the international shipping market, partly through the demonstrative effect of test voyages, is an urgent priority.

 

4.4 Evaluation of Economic Viability

In this section we weigh the business case for the NSR. Drawing on publicly available documents, this section touches on changes to shipping volume from the past to the present, as well as seasonal variations of shipping, types of cargo and issues of profitability in light of Russia's state of economic upheaval. Going forward, this section also looks at a hypothetical scenario for stimulating development of the NSR, in which the transit cargo between the Far East and Europe through the NSR is greatly increased, examining which types of cargo can be shifted to NSR transit shipment.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,066位
(30,729成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
8,784

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2019年4月13日

関連する他の成果物

1.平成12年度 技術開発基金による研究開発報告書
2.欧州におけるショピング・ファイナンス調査
3.欧州船舶管理会社の調査-船舶管理の観点からの舶用機器メーカーの目指すべき方向の検討-
4.インドネシアにおける造船用資機材調達の現状及び将来に関する調査
5.米国造船業の集約化に関する調査
6.東南アジア造船関連レポート19
7.ポーランド造船業の現状と展望
8.欧州における舶用工業企業の合併・買収に係る調査
9.米国における軍事技術の舶用工業への転化の実態・調査報告書
10.米国海運業(貨物輸送)のM&Aに関する調査報告書
11.豪州の海洋レジャー産業の現状
12.ジョーンズ・アクトに関する調査報告書(米国の内航海運等保護制度)
13.米国における海賊対策等に関する調査報告書
14.新世代のRoPaxが欧州市場に及ぼす影響
15.欧州における主機関の動向調査?ディーゼルエンジン・ガスタービン
16.中国造船業の概況
17.アジア市場におけるアセアンフェリー導入支援調査
18.環境にやさしい船舶と舶用機械設計の実際に関する調査報告書
19.米国における舶用エンジンからの排ガス規制に関する実態調査
20.東南アジア造船関連レポート20
21.タイ国におけるモーダルシフトに伴う新規造船需要に関する調査報告書
22.東南アジア・オセアニア地域海事事情調査
23.定期メンテナンスのお知らせパンフレット
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から