日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

The Local Administrative System in Japan

 事業名 地方自治情報啓発研究
 団体名 自治総合センター 注目度注目度5


Chapter 2 Main issues in promoting administrative reforms

 

1 Revision of administrative activities

 

(1) Rationalization of administrative activities

1: Reconsider the areas for which the administration should be responsible; work for greater rationalization through close consideration of the necessity for administrative intervention, balance of costs and benefits, efficiency, effect, etc.

2: When promoting reforms as mentioned in 1, local authorities should set out fixed points of emphasis in each fiscal year, according to their own situation, and work to carry them through systematically.

3: Even with projects which have already been planned or started, the decision to implement them further or not should be made after full reconsideration of their necessity and effectiveness.

4: Residents' demands are becoming more complex and diverse. Local authorities should grasp an understanding of these demands and work to choose or emphasize projects to be implemented.

5: In providing residents with services or implementing policies, local authorities should as far as possible coordinate across organizations and strive to ensure that work is carried out comprehensively.

6: Local authorities should strive for improvement of the administrative operating process to meet their own circumstances through the setting of well-defined targets and effective, all-round control of progress with the participation of staff members, and the induction and adaptation of the ideas and methods of the private sector, such as the use of circle activities or a suggestions system.

 

(2) Promotion of deregulation

1: The abolition or easing of regulations implemented by local authorities should be considered in order to sustain and strengthen the vigor of the private sector, to reduce the burden on residents and to simplify administration.

2: Licensing procedures should be made as simple and short as possible, in order to improve the service to residents. Especially, the affixing of seals by residents should be reconsidered and rationalized or abolished

 

(3) Promotion of delegation to the private sector

1: For more efficient administration and improved service for residents, local authorities should actively and systematically delegate to the private sector activities which may be properly delegated in line with local conditions.

2: In the case of l, local authorities should as appropriate control and supervise the private enterprises implementing the delegated administrative activities, in order to assure administration responsibility and to maintain and improve service.

3: The Ministry of Home Affairs plans to show some advanced examples of delegation to the private sector in another document.

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
1,571位
(29,208成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
5,089

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2017年10月21日

関連する他の成果物

1.ふるさと環境シンポジウム報告書「豊かな環境づくり大阪府民の集い」
2.ふるさとみやざき環境シンポジウム報告書「森からの贈り物」
3.地方分権推進フォーラム’98 in“とっとり”
4.地方分権推進フォーラム 徳島in’98
5.自治だより No.125
6.自治だより No.127
7.自治だより No.128
8.自治だより No.129
9.自治だより No.130
10.地方自治アニメーションビデオシリーズNo.6「がんばれ地方行革」
11.中央政府の査定・評価報告書
12.大都市行政制度に関する調査研究報告書
13.分権型社会に対応した地方税制のあり方に関する調査研究報告書
14.自治だより No.126
15.歴史的遺産・伝統文化(伝説・神話等)の活用による地域おこし懇談会報告書
16.「地方自治情報啓発研究」の報告書
17.ホールにおける市民参加型事業に関する調査研究
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から