日本財団 図書館

共通ヘッダを読みとばす


Top > 社会科学 > 社会 > 成果物情報

CIVIL AERONAUTICS LAW CABINET ORDER RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL AERONAUTICS LAW

 事業名 民間航空の発展に関する調査及び資料作成
 団体名 航空振興財団 注目度注目度5


 

when offering a comment in accordance with the provisions of the latter half of the preceding paragraph obtain a resolution from the assembly.

 

4. The regional administrative organization which manages a second class airport under the provision of paragraph 2 shall be regarded as the aerodrome provider with regard to the application of the provisions of the Civil Aeronautics Law (1952, Law No. 231).

 

(Establishment and Administration of Third Class Airports)
Article 5. Any regional administrative organization, which is designated by conferring with other regional administrative organizations specified by Cabinet Order, shall establish and manage/operate third class airports.

 

2. Mutual conferment under the provision of the preceding paragraph shall require a resolution from the assembly of the respective regional administrative organization concerned.

 

3. The Minister of Transport may, when deemed necessary in reference to the conferment prescribed under paragraph 1, mediate said conferment upon request from the regional administrative organizations concerned.

 

(Sharing Development Costs for Second Class Airports and Others)
Article 6. When the Minister of Transport establishes or modifies a runway, landing area, taxiway, or apron for public use in a second class airport established and managed/operated by the Minister of Transport, seventy-five percent (75%) of the required development cost shall be borne by the State and twenty-five percent (25%) by the prefectural government of the prefecture in which the airport concerned is located.

 

2. With regard to the preceding paragraph, when the establishment of the airport concerned significantly benefits a prefectural government other than that in which the airport is located, the Minister of Transport may allocate a portion of the prorated cost for the prefectural government in which the airport is located to the other prefectural government which is benefiting indirectly, to an extent which is weighted against such benefit.

 

3. The Minister of Transport shall, when intending to perform the tasks specified in paragraph 1, negotiate with the prefectural government which is to share the prorata cost prescribed under the provisions of the previous two paragraphs.

 

Article 7. A prefectural government may cause such cities, towns, and villages in the prefecture, which share the benefit of the establishment of the airport

 

 

 

BACK   CONTENTS   NEXT

 






サイトに関するご意見・ご質問・お問合せ   サイトマップ   個人情報保護

日本財団会長笹川陽平ブログはこちら
競艇の収益金はあなたの街でこのように使われています



ランキング
注目度とは?
成果物アクセスランキング
175位
(24,405成果物中)

成果物アクセス数
28,580

集計期間:成果物公開〜現在
更新日: 2008年5月10日

関連する他の成果物

1.平成8年度 ヘリコプターによる計器飛行方式等に関する研究報告書
2.「民間航空の発展に関する調査及び資料作成」の報告書
3.航空機乗員の医学適性研究報告書
  [ 同じカテゴリの成果物 ]


アンケートにご協力
御願いします

この成果物は
お役に立ちましたか?


とても役に立った
まあまあ
普通
いまいち
全く役に立たなかった


この成果物をどのような
目的でご覧になりましたか?


レポート等の作成の
参考資料として
研究の一助として
関係者として参照した
興味があったので
間違って辿り着いただけ


ご意見・ご感想

ここで入力されたご質問・資料請求には、ご回答できません。






その他・お問い合わせ
ご質問は こちら から